The Integrity of Truth in the Perspective of Counteracting “Bullshit” in the Educational Space of Modern Society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-8

Keywords:

bullshit, Harry G. Frankfurt, bullshiter, truth, integrity, error, lie, epistemology, educational space of modern society

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the philosophical analysis of the term “bullshit”, which was systematically conceptualized by the American philosopher Harry G. Frankfurt for a better understanding of the nature of truth, but at the same time increasingly as a self-sufficient term of epistemology. The authors of this article offer a creative translation of the term “bullshit” from English into Ukrainian as “fool”. Such a translation is not literal, but better conveys the epistemological meaning of the corresponding English term. Bohdan Shumsky carried out a systematic reconstruction of the concept of “bullshit” in Harry G. Frankfurt – reproducing the main outline of the philosophical searches of this American philosopher, as well as indicating the main directions in which the concept of “bullshit” is developed in English-speaking philosophy and to which practical areas it is applied. Mykhailo Boichenko introduces this analysis into a broader philosophical and cultural context, and also shows the significance of the concept of “fool” for the educational space of modern society – both as an object for research and conscious avoidance, and as a specific tool that deserves to be used in special cases. Some patterns of attitude towards stupidity, foolishness and foolishness in the history of philosophy and in Christian culture are traced. In addition, Mykhailo Boichenko is the first to offer a Ukrainian translation of the English “bullshiter” (“дурнограй”). The authors of the article show the ambivalence of sincerity, which is inherent in a fool, and substantiate the advantages of an ironic and instrumental attitude towards a fool, while maintaining the basic assessment of a fool as a predominantly negative assessment of a fool from an epistemological and axiological point of view. It has been demonstrated – both conceptually and through various examples – that nonsense helps to highlight and emphasize truth, goodness and justice – both by opposing them and by helping to choose the best path to them.

Author Biographies

Mykhailo Boichenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Senior Researcher, Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy; Leading Researcher of the Department of Interaction between Universities and Society, Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv-city, Ukraine).
Research interests: social philosophy as a methodology of social cognition, philosophy of neo-institutionalism, philosophy of education, philosophy of politics.

Bohdan Shumskyi

Bachelor of philosophy (Kyiv-city, Ukraine).
Research interests: analytical philosophy, philosophy of language, epistemology, communicative philosophy, social philosophy, political philosophy.

References

Boichenko, M. (2022). Correction of the naming of things: the coercion of war in education and public life. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 28(1), 11–27. https://doi. org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-1

Boichenko, M. (2023). Philosophy as an antidote to propaganda. [In Ukrainian]. In Tararoev, Ya. V., Kipensky, A. V., Dolska O. O. et al. (eds.). Philosophy in the Modern World: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference. (pp. 3–5). Kharkiv: KhPI. https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/71163

Calfee, J. E. (1985). Cigarette advertising, health information and regulation, before 1970. Working Paper No. 134. December 1985. Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Economics. Washington, DC 20580. https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/reports/cigarette-advertising-health-information-and-regulation-1970/ wp134.pdf

Camus, A. (2022). The Myth of Sisyphus. A Rebellious Man. (O. Zhupansky, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Folio.

Carson, T. L. (2016). Frankfurt and Cohen on bullshit, bullshiting, deception, lying, and concern with the truth of what one says. Pragmatics & Cognition, 23(1), 53–67. https:// doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.03car.

Cassen, B., & Sigov, K. (eds.). (2024). European Dictionary of Philosophies. Volume 5. Ukrainian Context: Lexicon of Untranslatables. (A. Vasylchenko, et al., trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter.

Chopyk, R. (2008). Gogol – Gogol – and the Devil. [In Ukrainian]. Word and Time, (10), 61-67.

Cohen, G. (2006). Deeper into bullshit. In Hardcastle, G. L. & Reisch G. A. (eds.). Bullshit and philosophy: Guaranteed to get perfect results every time (pp. 117–136). Chicago: Open Court.

Frankfurt, H. (1998). Necessity, volition, and love. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Frankfurt, H. (1986). On bullshit. Raritan, 6(2), 81–100.

Frankfurt, H. (2002). Reply to G. A. Cohen. In Buss, S. & Overton, L. (eds.). The contours of agency: essays on themes from Harry Frankfurt (pp. 340–345). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Frankfurt, H. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Frankfurt, H. (2006). On truth. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Heidegger, M. (1967). Sein und Zeit. Elfte, unveränderte Auflage. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.

Hulsewé, A. F. P. (1993). Shih chi. In Loewe, M. (ed). Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide. (Pp. 405-414). Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China/Institute of East Asian Studies.

Kant, I. (1956). Über ein vermeintes Recht aus Menschenliebe zu lügen. In Kant, I. Werke. Bd. 7. Hrsg. von W. Weischedel (S. 637–643). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Im Original erschienen 1797).

Maes, H., & Schaubroeck, K. (2006). Different kinds and aspects of bullshit. In Bullshit and philosophy: Guaranteed to get perfect results every time (pp. 117–136). Chicago: Open Court.

Menzhulin, V. I. (2006). Ridiculous, Empty and Sad in Modern Philosophy. [In Ukrainian]. NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 50, 44–49.

Moberger, V. (2020). Bullshit, pseudoscience and pseudophilosophy. Theoria, 86(5), 595– 611. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12271

Nietzsche, F. (2024). Gay Science. (V. Tchaikovsky, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Folio.

Ogienko, I. (trans.). (1962). The Holy Bible. [In Ukrainian]. https://www.truechristianity. info/ua/bible_ua.php

Petrocelli, J. V. (2021). The life-changing science of detecting bullshit. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Rodnyi, O. (2022). Carnivality’s poetics as M. Gogol’s philosophical world feeling. [In Ukrainian]. Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences, 5(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.15421/342207

Rotterdamsky, E. (1993). In Praise of Folly. Colloquia familiaria. (V. Lytvynova, & Y. Kobiv, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Sabadash, Y. S., Nikolchenko, Y. M., Pakhomenko, S. P. (2021). History of Italian Culture: A Textbook. Kyiv: Lira-K. [In Ukrainian].

Soothill, W. E., trans. (1910). Analects of Confucius. Yokohama: Fukuin Printing Co.

Sterne, L. (1978). The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. (M. New, & J. New, eds.). London: Penguin Books.

Stevenson, H. (2020). Reforming global climate governance in an age of bullshit. Globalizations, 18(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774315

Storm-Mathisen, F. (2025). ‘Violence is completely normal’: Managing Violence Through Narrative Normalization. The British Journal of Criminology, 65(1), 37–53. https://doi. org/10.1093/bjc/azae030

Swift, J. (2021). Travels to Different Faraway Countries of the World by Lemuel Gulliver, First a Doctor, and Then the Captain of Several Ships. (M. Ivanov, trans.). Kharkiv: Folio. [In Ukrainian].

Theophrastus. (1902). The Characters. (C. E. Bennett, & W. A. Hammond, trans. and intro). New York, London, and Bombay: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Voltaire. (1932). The Simpleton. (L. Ivchenkova, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. In Voltaire. Selected Works. (pp. 33-87). Kharkiv-Kyiv: Literature and Art.

Wittgenstein, L (1995). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Philosophical Studies. (Ye. Popovych, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Xu, Z. (2023). The Running Logic of Jacobin Dictatorship from the Perspective of Emotional History. Chen, Y. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2023 2nd International Conference on Public Culture and Social Services (PCSS 2023), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 787, 62-67. https://doi. org/10.2991/978-2-38476-130-2_9

Downloads

Abstract views: 55

Published

2025-09-04

How to Cite

Boichenko, M., & Shumskyi, B. (2025). The Integrity of Truth in the Perspective of Counteracting “Bullshit” in the Educational Space of Modern Society. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 31(1), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-8

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)