Calling of education: challenges and achievements of independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2021-27-1-2Keywords:
education, independence, calling, vocation, challenges, academic freedomAbstract
Education is a broad way to the individual, collective and societal success and independence: it consists of pedagogical efforts, learning and upbringing. All these components are united in educational communication that revealed personal vocation to some job and future profession, on the one hand, and spiritual strategic calling of life. The vocation itself is a challenge for the individual, local community and for the state, because it often requires the effort of all forces and the full revealing of one’s creative potential – to get a good citizen and successful member of community. At the same time, it is through the implementation of his or her vocation that the individual receives the resources and abilities giving him or her the strength and ability to respond to numerous external challenges. To give a proper answer for these challenges personality should find own core, reveals oneself and choose priority values. To get some benefits from job as a vocation it is necessary to find your calling in life – its main, strategic purpose, its intrinsic meaning: our calling gives us goals and our vocation gives us means to achieve these goals. Friedrich Nietzsche called for a genuine academic freedom as only honorable aim for student and researcher and gave a radical critique for the university bureaucracy and academic officialism. Such systematic and total criticism, not as nihilism, but as a component of the systematic search for an authentic vocation and sacred calling, is taught by education, and best of all, by academic education. Independence is not a gift or a trophy, it is a state of searching for one's own authenticity and a sense of pleasure in the struggle for it. Therefore, independence can and should be both personal and common – because human is always no less a social being in unity with others than in gaining his or her own autonomy through others.
References
Adorno, T. (2020) Taboo on the vocation of a teacher / transl. from germ. by: Boichenko, M. & Bryzhnik, V. Philosophy of Education, 26(2), 168-187. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-2-12. [In Ukrainian].
Anderson, B. (2016). [1991]. Imagined Communities: Reflections On the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London ; New York: Verso.
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Boychenko, M. I. (2014). Academic status of social philosophy in relation to its non-academic incarnations. Sophia. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, (1), 34-37. [In Ukrainian].
Cassil, L. (2018). Conduit and Swambrania. Moscow: Alphabet. [In Russian].
Corbin, A., Courtine, J.-J., & Vigarello, G. (2006). Histoire du corps. Les mutations du regard, le XXe siècle. V. 3. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Dewey, J. (1902). Academic Freedom. Educational Review, 23(1), 1-14.
Durkheim, E. (2013). [1893]. De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Eder, К. (1985). Geschichte als Lernprozess?: zur Pathogenese politischer Modernität in Deutschland. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.
Franko, I. (2017). Grits’ school science. Lviv: A-ba-ba-ha-la-ma-ha. [In Ukrainian].
Freire, P. (2000). [1970]. Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary edition). New York: Seabury Press.
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
Giersch, Th. (2017). Der Erfinder des Berufs. Handellsblatt. 31.10.2017. https://www.handelsblatt.com/karriere/wirtschaft_erlesen/500-jahre-martin-luther-der-erfinder-des-berufs/20512286.html?ticket=ST-9245395-fOyBhSkGh4GLytHFUqnF-ap6.
Gremmels, Chr. (1981) Arbeit und Beruf bei Martin Luther. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik und Theologie 33(4), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpt-1981-0405
Guzhva, A. (2017). Small communities as the basis of civil society. Philosopher – interlocutor of the world: dialogue, communication, consensus: Materials of the XXV Kharkiv International Skovoroda Readings dedicated to the 295th anniversary of the birth of G. S. Skovoroda (OKZ "National Literary Memorial Museum of G. S. Skovoroda, September 30 - October 1, 2017) Kharkiv: Maidan, 217–220. [In Ukrainian].
Habermas, J. (1986). Die Idee der Universität – Lernprozesse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 32 (5), 703-718.
Habermas, J. (2020). [1962]. Die Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2017). [1821]. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse Zum Gebrauch für seine Vorlesungen. Berlin: Hofenberg.
Heidegger, M. (2016). [1933]. Die Selbstbehauptung der deutschen Universität. https://phil.hse.ru/data/2016/10/03/1122904343/Heidegger.pdf
Illich, I. (2000). [1972]. Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row.
Jaspers, K. (2016). [1961]. Wissenschaft, Lehrfreiheit und Politik. Ist die Freiheit von Forschung und Lehre, ist die geistige Grundlage der Universität in der Bundesrepublik bedroht? Jaspers, K. Gesamtausgabe. Band I/21. Schriften zur Universitätsidee. Basel: Schwabe Verlag, 445-456.
Kant, I. (1784) Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Berlinische Monatsschrift, (12), 481–494.
Luckmann, T. (1967). The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York, Macmillan Company.
Mannheim, K. (1929). Ideologie und Utopie. Bohn: Friedrich Cohen.
Moore, B., Jr. (2016). [1978]. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. London: Macmillan.
Nietzsche, F. (1954). Über die Zukunft unserer Bildungs-Anstalten. Friedrich Nietzsche: Werke in drei Bänden. München, Band 3, 177-263.
Prokopovych L. S., & Morgun A. V. (2017). Pedagogical orientation of Ivan Franko's works about children. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 1 (5), 156-159. [In Ukrainian].
Rorty, R. (1996). Does academic freedom have philosophical presuppositions? L. Menand (Ed.), The future of academic freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 21-42.
Scheler, M. (1926). Probleme einer Soziologie des Wissens. Scheler, M. Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Der Neue-Geist Verlag, 1-229.
Schütz A., & Luckmann T. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK/UTB.
Searle, J. R. (1971). The Campus War: A Sympathetic Look At The University In Agony. New York: World Pub. Co.
Sereda, I. V. (2020). Pedagogical deontology, rhetoric and culture of speech: a textbook. Mykolaiv: Ilion. [In Ukrainian].
Shevchenko, Y. M. (author - incl.). (2018). Pedagogical deontology: teaching methodical textbook. [for students of specialty "Primary Education"]. Melitopol: Publishing and Printing Center "Lux". [In Ukrainian].
Stelmakh, N. V. (2019). Ways of formation of deontological culture of the future teacher. Innovative pedagogy, 17 (1), 149-153. [In Ukrainian].
Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: the importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73 (1), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247/
Waldenfels, B. (2020). [1997]. Topographie des Fremden: Studien zur Phänomenologie des Fremden 1. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp.
Weber, M. (2016). [1905]. Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Berlin: Hofenberg.
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 334
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
