Models of Educational Philosophy in International Forms of Education management. Specificity of the Continental European Educational and Scientific System

Authors

  • Viktor Zinchenko Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine

Abstract

In today’s world there is diversification of different models of higher education. At the same time, the multiplicity and the diversity of higher education models do not exclude their identity. Internationalization and integration of institutions of higher education in a global and international dimension raise many new questions for the theory and practice. Among them the author emphasizes the most important ones: what is the general and the particular in education and science; what patterns, forms, methods of management are universal and which are in the range of the specific conditions of different countries; what is the best way to realize the functions of education and science in the international activity; what are the features of national identity in education and in the development of the University as an institution of education, and also in organizational behavior, management systems; to what extent these features are important to achieve the desired results; how can foreigners quickly adapt to national environment. All these problems are extremely important and interesting, still waiting for their reply. At the same time multi-modeling education systems do not exclude their common problems: the necessity of permanent adaptation of educational programs to current needs of society, the increased requirements to the level and quality of education. The modernization of social, economic and political development and the potential of anthropological and psychological structure of the personality in values and normative dimension of the contemporary globalized societies of the world; reformation strategies in society, education and management, their globalization and the processes of institutionalization and perspectives of humanization of educational systems, management, upbringing are analyzed in the given article. It is noted that among the existing conditions and prerequisites the existence of developed civil society is necessary for the successful formation and functioning of educational systems and effective models of multi-level educational management.

Thus, we can conclude that the strategy of development of the modern world social philosophy of upbringing and education is one of the key issues in the field of social management and philosophy, pedagogy, global social development. The way of organization and functioning of civil society in present-day and future to a great extent depends on what exactly do we mean by upbringing, education and science, or which paradigm of upbringing and education is dominant at the given social and historical stage. The continuity of public education, quality management, their intensity can only be achieved under two conditions of a fundamental character. One of them is use of new, theoretically grounded and practically proven management, philosophically developed, and available technically secured high technology of social work, education and training, learning. The second one is the perfect mastery of human in the methodology of self-socio-axiological and research activities. The established structure shall provide the same conditions for equitable selection of civil, educational, scientific and educational actions, excluding coercion and domination.

Author Biography

Viktor Zinchenko, Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of philosophical sciences, Principal research scientist

References

Зінченко В.В. Соціальна філософія менеджменту і освіти в інституційному вимірі глобального розвитку (інтегративна концептологія). – К.: Люксар, 2011. – 664 с.

Марсель Г. Быть и иметь. – Новочеркасск: Сагуна, 1994. – 159 с.

Мунье Э. Что такое персонализм? – М.: Издательство. гуманитарной литературы, 1994. – 128 c.

Штейнер Р. Очерк теории познания Гётевского мировоззрения. – М.: Парсе¬фаль, 1993.- 142 с.

Кузнецова О. Ю. Розвиток теоретичних ідей і практики освіти у Великій Брита¬нії. – Харків: Константа, 2002. – 236 с.

Равные возможности для всех. Проект программы реформ в области образова¬ния Президента США//Образование, которое мы можем потерять. Сборник. Изд.2-е, дополненное. – М .: МГУ, 2003. – 288 с. – С. 213-248.

Amiot M. A quoi sert l’universite? – Grenoble : PUF, 2008. – 183 р.

Barrow R. Moral Philosophy for Education. – Boston, London: George Allen and Unwin,1998. – 367 р.

Bollnow О.F. Einfache Sittlichkeit. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1947. – 211 s.

Bollnow О. F. Franzosischer Existenzialismus. – Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 1965. – 212 s.

Bollnow O.F. Kriese und neuer Anfang//Beitra#ge zur Pa#dagogische Anthropologie. – Heidelberg: Quelle&Meyer, 1966. – 152 s.

Bollnow О. F. Neue Geborgenheit. Das Problem einer U#berwindung des Existenzialismus. – Stuttgart, Ko#ln: Kohlhammer, 1979. – 247 s.

Bollnow О.F. Studien zur Hermeneutik (Zwei Bande). Band 1: Zur Philosophie der Geisteswissenschaften. – Mu#nchen: K. Alber, 1982. – 344 s.

Boyd D. Pedagogy for the Reign of God: A Theological Perspective on the Educational Philosophy of Paulo Freire. Eastern University Working Papers. available at http:// ngoleader.org/articles/56/4/Paulo-Freire/Page4.html.

Buchanan P.J. The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. – New York:Thomas Dunne Books, 2002. – 320 p.

Bufford Th. Toward а Philosophy Education. – Boston:World-Press,2001. – 278 р.

Burbules N.C. Philosophy of Education//(Forthcoming in the International Encyclopedic Dictionary of Education, Routledge Publishing) – http://www.ed.uiuc. edu/facstaff/burbules/ncb/papers/phed. html.

Byram M. and Dervin F. (eds.) Students, staff and academic mobility in higher education. – Newcastle-upon-Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008. – 320 p.

Clement St. Handbook of education technology. – London: Steven Hackbarth Books, 2004. – 284 р.

Cole M. Globalisation, Modernisation and Competitiveness: a critique of New Labour in Education / М. Cole //International Studies in Sociology of Education. – 2008. – v. 8 n. 3. – Р.315-332. – 182 р.

Combs А. Humanism, education and future. – Boston: Educational Leadership, 2013.– 301 р.

Cucrowiez H. Universite et emploi. – Lille: PUF, 2006. – 322 р.

Dewey J.Democracy and education. – New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Company, 1966. – 212 p.

Dewey J. Reconstruction in Philosophy. – Boston: Beacon Press, 1957. – 156 p.

Еwby H. Some Possible Futures for Higher Education. – London : CVCP, 2009, available at www.cvcp.ac.UK/WhatWeDo/Speeches.

Feinberg W. Behavioral theory and education. – Boston: Prentice-Hall, 1994. – 467 p.

Gablot E. La barriere et le niveau. Etude socialogique de la bourgeoisie francaise. – Paris: Modern, 2013. – 182 р.

Gobler Н P., Lessing Н. U. (Hrsg.) О. F. Bollnow im Gesprach. – Freiburg / Mu#nchen, 1983. – 241 s.

Harris A. Teaching Morality and Religion.- London:Allen and Unwin,1996.-127 p.

Harris К. Teachers and Classes. A Social Analysis. – Edinburgh.: Education Press, 2002. – 216 p.

Kellner D. Critical Theory, Marxism, and Modernity. – Cambridge, UK and Baltimore, Md.: Polity Press and John Hopkins University Press, 2009. – 288 р.

Kozol J. The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. – New York: Broadway Books, 2014. – 432 р.

Kwiek M. The University and the State. A Study into Global Transformations. – Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2006. – 424 p.

Lechuga V. Assessment, Knowledge, and Customer Service: Contextualizing Faculty Work at For-Profit Colleges and Universities. The review of Higher Education, 2008. – 31(3). – Р. 287–307.

Liessmann K. P. Theorie der Unbildung: Die Irrtu#mer der Wissensgesellschaft. – Wien : Paul Zsolnay, 2010. – 176 s.

Morita T. Zur Bollnow – Reception in Japan. In: Padagogische Rundschau. 1983, 37, N. 6. – S.623-627.

Nohl H. Pa#dagogische Menschenkunde (Die pa#dagogischen, psychologischen und soziologischen Grundlagen der Pa#dagogik) II Handbuch der Pa#dagogik. Bd. 2. Langensalza. – Weinheim/Basel, 1981.–344 s. – S.51-75.

Overbeek H. and K. van der Pijl «Restructuring Capital and Restructuring Hegemony», in Overbeek (ed), Restructuring Hegemony, in the Global Political Economy; The rise of transnational neo-liberalism in the 2000s, London; Routledge, 2012. – 293 р. – Р.246-282 р.

Pattern V. Social control and human engineering: A framework for humanistic decision. – Bangor : University Press, 1991. – 227 р.

Rogers C.R. «Toward Becoming a Fully Functioning Person». – In: Perceiving, Behaving, Becoming: A New Focus for Education.Yearbook. Ed. A. W. Combs(edited by A. W. Combs). – Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1999. – 256 р.

Shelley P.B. A Philosophical View of Reform. – Lexington KY: Ulan Press, 2012. – 114 р.

Sintschenko V.V. Weltgesellschaft: postimperialismus und die aufteilung der welt // Aktualne problemy nowoczesnych nauk. – 2013. – Volume 15. – Przemys2l: Nauka i studia. – S. 63-71.

Warwick D. The Future Business of Universities, Speech to the Association of Business Schools, 23 April, 2009. Аavailable at www.universitiesuk.ac.UK/services.

Wheeler H. Beyond the Punitive Society. – San-Francisco : Hackett Publishing Co, 2013. – 301 р. Zinchenko V. Global institutional transformation strategies of self-management systems//Zeszyty Naukowe Wyszej Szkoy Humanitas Zarza(dzanie. – 2015. – (4). – P.169–176.

Zinchenko V. Institutional Aspects of Globalization and Regionalization in the Context of the Transformation of Society // Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. – Vol. 1, No. 4, 2015. – Р. 415–421.

Zinchenko V. Institutional transformations systems of society and perspectives of critical theory in the social philosophy of education//Pedagogikа Filozoficznа. – № 1. – 2015. – S. 59–68.

iek S. The Ticklish Subject. The Absent Center of Political Ontology. – London:Verso, 2000. – 221 р. – P. 128–143.

Downloads

Abstract views: 213

Published

2015-12-01

How to Cite

Zinchenko, V. (2015). Models of Educational Philosophy in International Forms of Education management. Specificity of the Continental European Educational and Scientific System. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 17(2), 153–181. Retrieved from https://philosopheducation.com/index.php/philed/article/view/511

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)