Philosophical Foundations of Collective Responsibility on the Example of the Activities of the European Court of Human Rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-1

Keywords:

international justice, European Court of Human Rights, concept, concept of «collective agent», collective responsibility, legal responsibility, social agency, imputatio, Lehrnprozess, Arendt, Jaspers

Abstract

The scale of the consequences caused by Russia’s aggression against Ukraine inevitably leads to reflections on the collective responsibility of Russian citizens. The philosophical justification of collective responsibility is still problematic. The main issues under debate are the possibility of the existence of collective social agents and collective guilt as a basis for imposing responsibility. This article proposes to look at the activities of the European Court of Human Rights as a practice of collective responsibility in international law. The activities of the European Court of Human Rights can serve as a practical benchmark for assessing certain theoretical positions. Important historical experience is provided by the practice of holding the international military tribunal in Nuremberg (Germany, November 20, 1945 – October 1, 1946), which had the status of an international court over the military and political leadership of Nazi Germany – known as the Nuremberg Trials. With this practical example of collective responsibility in mind, the study proposes to conduct a selective reverse review of the philosophical views of Hannah Arendt and Karl Jaspers. The study demonstrates that although the reflections of these philosophers were not without certain flaws, Arendt and Jaspers, focusing mainly on different aspects, were able to offer a generally sound justification for collective responsibility. Their proposed justification can serve as a foundation for further developments in this area. The practical significance of this conclusion is that it may give impetus to the development of new legal mechanisms of collective responsibility of the Russians for the consequences of their unjustified aggression against Ukraine. Such collective responsibility has not only legal, but also moral and political dimensions, and is also a component of the so-called social «educational process» (Lernprozess).

Author Biography

Serghiy Zayets, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

PhD Student, department of logic; Attorney (Member of the Ukrainian National Bar Association), Expert on human rights training programs for lawyers at the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union (UHHRU)

References

Arendt, H., & Kohn, J. (2003). Responsibility and judgment (1st ed). New York: Schocken Books.

Baumeister, Andriі. (2009). IMPUTATIO. In European Vocabulary of Philosophy: Lexicon of Intransigence. Vol. I. (Pp. 485–497). Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Belgian Foreign Affairs. (2014). Role of the European Court of Human Rights - Paula Marckx’ case in English. https://vimeo.com/112904434

Collins, S. (2020). Collective Responsibility and International Relations. Bazargan-Forward, S., & Tollefsen, D. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility. (Pp. 331-346). New York: Routledge.

Council of Europe. (1950). European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

Council of Europe (Committee of Ministers). (2006). Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. https://rm.coe.int/16806eebf0

Council of Europe (Committee of Ministers). (2022a). On the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation to the Council of Europe. CM/Res(2022)2. https://rm.coe.int/0900001680a5da51

Council of Europe (Committee of Ministers). (2022b). On legal and financial consequences of the cessation of membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe. CM/Res(2022)3. https://rm.coe.int/resolution-cm-res-2022-3-legal-and-financial-conss-cessation-membershi/1680a5ee99

Dashkovska, O. R., Yavorsky, V. O., & Bezsonova, K. D. (2021). Positive legal responsibility: General theoretical characteristics. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 64, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.64.3

ECtHR. (2013a). Rudnichenko v. Ukraine. App. no. 2775/07. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122187

ECtHR. (2013b). Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine. App. no. 21722/11. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115871

Frankl, V. E. (1997). Viktor Frankl recollections: An autobiography. Trans. by J. Fabry & J. Fabry. New York: Insight Books/Plenum Press.

Frankl, V. (2016). Man’s Search for Meaning. Psychologist in Concentration Camps. Trans. by O. Zamoyska. Kharkiv: Family leisure club.

Hafner-Burton, E. M. (2008). Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem. International Organization, 62(4), 689–716.

Hryshchuk, V. K. (2012). Social Responsibility. Handbook. Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Lviv: [unknown publisher].

Inter-Allied Declaration. (1942). Punishment for War Crimes. His Majesty’s Stationary Office. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-648522001/view?partId=nla.obj-648522082

Jaspers, K. (2000). The question of German guilt. Trans. by E. B. Ashton. New York: Fordham University Press.

Jaspers, K., & Jaspers, K. (1979). Die Schuldfrage ; Für Völkermord gibt es keine Verjährung (1.-10. Tsd.). München: Piper.

O’Connell, M. E., & VanderZee, L. (2013). The History of International Adjudication. Romano, C. P. R., Alter, K. J., & Shany, Y. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication ( Pp. 40-62). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199660681.003.0003

Smiley, M. (2022). Collective Responsibility. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford. edu/archives/win2022/entries/collective-responsibility/

Stoutland, F. (2008). The Ontology of Social Agency. Analyse & Kritik, 30(2), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0210

United Nations. (1998). The Romes Statute of the International Criminal Court, A/ CONF.183/9. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/ rome-statute-international-criminal-court

United Nations (General Assembly). (2001). Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. A/RES/56/83. https://undocs.org/Home/Mobile?FinalSymbol=A%2 FRES%2F56%2F83&Language=E&DeviceType=Desktop&LangRequested=False

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2003). Civil Code of Ukraine. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/435-15

Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press

Downloads

Abstract views: 209

Published

2023-07-21

How to Cite

Zayets, S. (2023). Philosophical Foundations of Collective Responsibility on the Example of the Activities of the European Court of Human Rights . Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-1

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.