Descriptiveness of Nonlinear Theoretical Knowledge and Self-Organization of Nonlinear Science
Correspondence between descriptiveness of nonlinear theoretical knowledge about self-organizing phenomena and descriptive epistemological models in foundations of self-organizing nonlinear science demonstrates the becoming of adequate methodological consciousness in the sphere of nonlinear studies. It means the revision of epistemological foundations for nonlinear methodology, specifically the understanding of scientific truth as nonlinear process. Self-organizing system choices by chance one of its nonlinear dynamic’s variant. Theory predicts the branching in bifurcation points of graphs of nonlinear equations solutions. Realization by system one of the possibilities, expressed by the solution, does not mean that other solutions were not the scientific truth. Theoretical explanation of realized state of nonlinear process is real necessity, which includes information about choice in bifurcation point. So, it is theoretical description of certain variant of self-organization.
It is interesting that science of self-organization is self-organizing itself, complementing the disciplinary organization by self-organizing interdisciplinary communities of scientists.
Bilous, T.M. (2013). Naturalism in the modern philosophy of science: cognitive principles. Naukovyy visnyk Chernivetsʹkoho universytetu. Filosofiya, V. 663-664, 246-252 [in Ukrainian].
Husserl, E. (1992). The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology. Voprosy filosofii,
No. 7, 136-176 [in Russian].
Danilov, Y. (2003). Fractality [in Russian]. URL: http://kirsoft.com.ru/freedom/KSNews_271.htm
Dobronravova, I.S. (1990). Synergetics: the formation of nonlinear thinking. Kiev: "Lybid" [in Russian].
Dobronravova I.S. (1999). Norms of scientific research in nonlinear natural sciences. Filosofsʹka dumka, No. 4, 36-48 [in Ukrainian].
Dobronravova I.S. (2004). Synergetics as a general scientific research program. In: Synergetic paradigm. Cognitive-communicative strategies of modern scientific knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 78-87 [in Russian].
Dobronravova, I.S. (2009). Post-non-classical rationality and philosophical foundations of synergetic methodology. In: Post-non-classics. M. «Mirʺ», 296-314 [in Russian].
Dobronravova I.S. (2014). Practical philosophy of post-non-classical science about scientific truth and human freedom. Filosofiya osvity. Philosophy of Education, № 2 (15), 224-234 [in Ukrainian].
Kant, I. (1993). Prolegomena. М.: "Progress" [in Russian].
Knyazeva, E.N. (2012). Nonlinear Dynamic Approach to Epistemology. In: Evolutionary epistemology. Moscow-Saint-Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives [in Russian].
Komar O.V. (2009). Humanization of science or naturalization of philosophy? Naukovyy visnyk Chernivetsʹkoho universytetu: zb. nauk. pr., V. 466-467: Filosofiya, 82-86 [in Ukrainian].
Krymsʹkyy, S.B. (2008). Requests for philosophical meanings. In: Krymsʹkyy, S.B. Under the signature of Sofia. Kyiv: Publishing House "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy", 441-718 [in Ukrainian].
Latour, B. (2006). There was no new time. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University [in Russian].
Latour, B. (2013). Science in action. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University [in Russian].
Mamardashvili, M.K. (1990). The idea of continuity and the philosophical tradition. In: Mamardashvili M.K. As I understand philosophy. M .: Progress, 91-99 [in Russian].
Mamardashvili, M.K. (1982). Science and culture. In: Mamardashvili M.K. As I understand philosophy. Moscow: “Progress”, 337-356 [in Russian].
Nesterova, M.A. (2015). Cognitivistics: origins, challenges, prospects. Sumy: Universitetskaya kniga [in Russian].
Paitgen, H.-O., Richter, P.H. (1993). The beauty of fractals: Images of complex dynamic systems. Moscow: Mir [in Russian].
Putnem H. (1978). How can you not talk about meaning. In: The structure and development of science. Moscow: “Progress”, 396-418 [in Russian].
Stepin V.S. (1989). Science and values of man-made civilization. Voprosy filosofii, 10, 3-18 [in Russian].
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.