Descriptiveness of Nonlinear Theoretical Knowledge and Self-Organization of Nonlinear Science

  • Iryna Dobronravova Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University
Keywords: descriptiveness, nonlinear theoretical knowledge, self-organization, nonlinear science

Abstract

Correspondence between descriptiveness of nonlinear theoretical knowledge about self-organizing phenomena and descriptive epistemological models in foundations of self-organizing nonlinear science demonstrates the becoming of adequate methodological consciousness in the sphere of nonlinear studies. It means the revision of epistemological foundations for nonlinear methodology, specifically the understanding of scientific truth as nonlinear process. Self-organizing system choices by chance one of its nonlinear dynamic’s variant. Theory predicts the branching in bifurcation points of graphs of nonlinear equations solutions. Realization by system one of the possibilities, expressed by the solution, does not mean that other solutions were not the scientific truth. Theoretical explanation of realized state of nonlinear process is real necessity, which includes information about  choice in bifurcation point. So, it is theoretical description of certain variant of self-organization.

It is interesting that science of self-organization is self-organizing itself, complementing the disciplinary organization by self-organizing interdisciplinary communities of scientists.

Author Biography

Iryna Dobronravova, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University

Dr habil. in Philosophy, Professor, Chair of Philosophy and Methodology of Science, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, President of Ukrainian Synergetic Society, member of Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(Vienna, Austria).

References

Bilous, T.M. (2013). Naturalism in the modern philosophy of science: cognitive principles. Naukovyy visnyk Chernivetsʹkoho universytetu. Filosofiya, V. 663-664, 246-252 [in Ukrainian].

Husserl, E. (1992). The crisis of European science and transcendental phenomenology. Voprosy filosofii,

No. 7, 136-176 [in Russian].

Danilov, Y. (2003). Fractality [in Russian]. URL: http://kirsoft.com.ru/freedom/KSNews_271.htm

Dobronravova, I.S. (1990). Synergetics: the formation of nonlinear thinking. Kiev: "Lybid" [in Russian].

Dobronravova I.S. (1999). Norms of scientific research in nonlinear natural sciences. Filosofsʹka dumka, No. 4, 36-48 [in Ukrainian].

Dobronravova I.S. (2004). Synergetics as a general scientific research program. In: Synergetic paradigm. Cognitive-communicative strategies of modern scientific knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 78-87 [in Russian].

Dobronravova, I.S. (2009). Post-non-classical rationality and philosophical foundations of synergetic methodology. In: Post-non-classics. M. «Mirʺ», 296-314 [in Russian].

Dobronravova I.S. (2014). Practical philosophy of post-non-classical science about scientific truth and human freedom. Filosofiya osvity. Philosophy of Education, № 2 (15), 224-234 [in Ukrainian].

URL:philosopheducation.com

Kant, I. (1993). Prolegomena. М.: "Progress" [in Russian].

Knyazeva, E.N. (2012). Nonlinear Dynamic Approach to Epistemology. In: Evolutionary epistemology. Moscow-Saint-Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives [in Russian].

Komar O.V. (2009). Humanization of science or naturalization of philosophy? Naukovyy visnyk Chernivetsʹkoho universytetu: zb. nauk. pr., V. 466-467: Filosofiya, 82-86 [in Ukrainian].

Krymsʹkyy, S.B. (2008). Requests for philosophical meanings. In: Krymsʹkyy, S.B. Under the signature of Sofia. Kyiv: Publishing House "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy", 441-718 [in Ukrainian].

Latour, B. (2006). There was no new time. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University [in Russian].

Latour, B. (2013). Science in action. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the European University [in Russian].

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1990). The idea of continuity and the philosophical tradition. In: Mamardashvili M.K. As I understand philosophy. M .: Progress, 91-99 [in Russian].

Mamardashvili, M.K. (1982). Science and culture. In: Mamardashvili M.K. As I understand philosophy. Moscow: “Progress”, 337-356 [in Russian].

Nesterova, M.A. (2015). Cognitivistics: origins, challenges, prospects. Sumy: Universitetskaya kniga [in Russian].

Paitgen, H.-O., Richter, P.H. (1993). The beauty of fractals: Images of complex dynamic systems. Moscow: Mir [in Russian].

Putnem H. (1978). How can you not talk about meaning. In: The structure and development of science. Moscow: “Progress”, 396-418 [in Russian].

Stepin V.S. (1989). Science and values of man-made civilization. Voprosy filosofii, 10, 3-18 [in Russian].

Published
2017-06-01
How to Cite
Dobronravova, I. (2017). Descriptiveness of Nonlinear Theoretical Knowledge and Self-Organization of Nonlinear Science. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 20(1), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-20-1-30-42
Section
Articles