Development of an Assessment Methodology for Educational Platforms in the Context of Educators’ Innovation and Research Activities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-6

Keywords:

assessment methodology, open educational resources, educational platforms, digitalization of education, analytic hierarchy process, pairwise comparison matrix

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the development of a universal methodology for assessing the quality of modern educational platforms. In the global digitalization of education, there is a growing need for a systematic approach to analyzing the effectiveness, accessibility, and user experience of learning platforms. The authors propose a methodology that considers eight key criteria: accessibility and inclusivity, usability and interface design, user interaction and engagement, user support and feedback, payment, adaptability to individual learning pace, multilanguage and localization, and certification. The research methodology combines quantitative and qualitative analysis methods, ensuring a comprehensive and objective assessment. A distinctive feature of the proposed approach is the use of the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight coefficients of the criteria, enhancing scientific validity. An important aspect of the study is its focus on the needs of various user categories, particularly persons with disabilities, which makes the methodology inclusive. The article explores tools and approaches for evaluating existing platforms based on the proposed criteria and methodology, which holds practical value for developers and administrators of educational environments. The research findings will be useful to a wide range of professionals: developers of educational platforms, researchers in the field of digital transformation of education, educators, and institutional leaders. The proposed methodology can serve as a foundation for developing quality standards for digital educational resources and will contribute to the advancement of a modern academic environment accessible to all users. The article emphasizes the importance of the continuous improvement of educational platforms in response to the dynamic development of digital technologies and society’s evolving needs.

Author Biographies

Maksym Maksymov, Odesа Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Software and Computer-Integrated Technologies, Erasmus+ SMART-PL project coordinator.
Research field: automation of technological processes, modeling and optimization of energy systems, computer-integrated control systems, innovative approaches to energy facility management.

Valentin Davydov, Odesа Polytechnic National University

Candidate of Technical Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Software and Computer-Integrated Technologies, Director of the Educational Center “Learning with No Limits”.
Research field: modeling and automation of energy systems, information and measurement technologies, energy efficiency improvement, computer-integrated control systems, simulation modeling and optimization of technological processes

Taia Petik, Odesа Polytechnic National University

PhD, Senior Lecturer at the Educational Center “Learning with No Limits”.
Research field: automation of technological processes, modeling of complex dynamic systems, development and optimization of control algorithms, analysis of technical processes in critical engineering systems.

Maksym Grishyn, Odesа Polytechnic National University

PhD, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Software and Computer-Integrated Technologies, staff member of the Educational Center “Learning with No Limits”.
Research field: automation and computer-integrated technologies, mathematical modeling of technical systems, information technologies in the energy sector, automated control and monitoring systems.

References

Baas, M., Van Der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., Van Den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessments of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857

Çakmak, T., Özel, N., & Yılmaz, M. (2013). Evaluation of the Open Course Ware Initiatives within the Scope of Digital Literacy Skills: Turkish Open CourseWare Consortium Case. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2013.06.014

DeVries, I. (2013). Evaluating Open Educational Resources: Lessons Learned. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2013.06.012

Khosravi, H., Denny, P., Moore, S., & Stamper, J. (2023). Learnersourcing in the age of AI: Student, educator and machine partnerships for content creation. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100151

Lambert, S. R. (2019). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693

Misut, M., & Pribilova, K. (2015). Measuring of quality in the context of e-Learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.02.347

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (2024). W3C Recommendation. 12 December 2024. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22

Downloads

Abstract views: 17

Published

2025-09-04

How to Cite

Maksymov, M., Davydov, V., Petik, T., & Grishyn, M. (2025). Development of an Assessment Methodology for Educational Platforms in the Context of Educators’ Innovation and Research Activities. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 31(1), 90–110. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-6

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.