Transgressive dimension of the information society in the context of sustainable development: philosophical and praxeological analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-10Keywords:
education, transgression, global educational development, information society, sustainable development, social change.Abstract
In the second half of the twentieth century in the socio-political, economic, cultural life of society began transgressive changes that opened new prospects for the development of society in general and man in particular. The main civilizational tendencies that prompted these changes and continue to be affirmed in the 21st century are: firstly, the tendency towards global social development; secondly, humanity’s acquisition of the ability to self-derail, which is associated with the development of nuclear technologies and global environmental problems; thirdly, the transition of humanity from industrial to scientific and information technologies. It was these trends that initiated the transition to a new type of organization of public life of people, which was called “information society”. Informationism is a strategy to focus on information technologies development, to create multiple ways of accumulation of knowledge and to provide increasingly complex information processing. However, when it comes to the formation of an information society, it is understood not only as a stage of technological development, but as a new stage of spiritual development of mankind. For the first time, the information society produces in the general social volume such features of social existence, which require new approaches to the formation of structural, functional and value components of the social organism. The education system within the framework of the new paradigm is designed to function as a direct generator of new social realities that produces social changes. Accordingly, the educational circuit, as the institutional functioning of a certain value system, should cover all spheres of life, become the core of sustainable social development in general.
References
Aliev M. G. (2003) A culture of consent as an effective factor in globalization. [In Russian]. Sociological Research 6(230). 21–28.
Beck, U. (2000). What is Globalization? / Trans. by P. Camiller. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Goffron, A. (2003). Cultural and epistemological positions of educational concepts in se¬lected European countries: monograph. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Higher School.
Gorbunova, L. (2015) Liminality as a Concept of Philosophy (to the Rationale of Transfor¬mative Learning). [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 17(2), 65–94.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition. A report on knowledge. / trans. by G. Bennington and B. Massumi; foreword by F. Jameson. Manchester University Press, 1984.
Ovcharuk, O. (2003). Modern trends in the development of the content of education in foreign countries. [In Ukrainian]. Way of Education (2), 17–21.
Smirnov, S. N. (1978). Elements of the philosophical content of the concept of “system” as a stage in the development of knowledge and social practice. [In Russian]. System Analysis and Scientific Knowledge. Moscow: Nauka, 60–83.
The Council of Europe. (1997). Lisbon Recognition Convention. https://www.coe.int/en/ web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=165
Magna Charta Universitatum 2020. (2020). Observatory Magna Charta Universitatum. http://www.magna-charta.org/magna-charta-universitatum/mcu-2020
UNESCO. (2015). Sustainable Development Goal 4. SDG 4. https://www.sdg4education2030. org/the-goal
UN. (2002). Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, 26 August-4 September 2002, Johannesburg, South Africa. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/ WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm
UN. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Report of the United Na¬tions Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassem-bly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf
UN. (2015). Transforming our world. The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. (A/ RES/70/1, 25 September 2015), United Nations, New York NY. https://sustainablede-velopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustain¬able%20Development%20web.pdf
Yaroshenko A. (2004). Value discourse of education. Monograph. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: NPU M. P. Drahomanov.
Zhuravskyi, V. S. (2003). Higher education as a factor of state formation and culture in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: In Yure.
Zinchenko, V. Global institutional transformations for sustainable development of society in the context of internationalization of higher education and science. [In Ukrainian]. V. Zinchenko (Ed.). Strategies of higher education in conditions of internationalization for sustainable development of society: Monograph. Kyiv: Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 8–34.
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 159
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.