Pyrrhonian Skepticism as a Tool of Epistemic Defense Against the Ideology of the “russian world”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-9

Keywords:

Pyrrhonian skepticism, ἐποχή, ataraxia, “russian world” (russkiy mir), epistemic defense, Agrippa’s tropes, critical thinking, philosophy of education

Abstract

Relevance. The ideology of the “russian world” (russkiy mir) functions not through rational argumentation but as an affective apparatus, mobilizing civic consensus via ressentiment, fear, and nostalgia. Prevailing counter-disinformation strategies rely primarily on cognitive verification tools; however, these remain inadequate as the ideology bypasses the rational faculty through its profound affective impact. Society must have both cognitive and affective resources for self-defense, that is, the ability not only to recognize manipulation, but also to be inaccessible to it. This study aims to explore Pyrrhonian ἐποχή and ataraxia as instruments of epistemic defense against the “russian world" ideology and to delineate the pedagogical implications of these findings for the Ukrainian educational context. Methods. The research employs a theoretical conceptual analysis incorporating elements of hermeneutics and interdisciplinary synthesis at the intersection of ancient skepticism, social epistemology, ideology theory, and critical “russian world” studies. Novelty. For the first time, a direct correlation is established between the Pyrrhonian tradition and resistance to this specific contemporary ideological system. The study introduces the concept of “epistemic ataraxia” – a state of affective and epistemological resilience achieved through the consistent application of ἐποχή. Furthermore, it demonstrates that Agrippa’s five tropes serve as an operationalized tool for disrupting the chain of ideological influence. Conclusion. The ancient Pyrrhonian tradition turns out to be not an archival artifact, but a living resource. Pyrrhonian ἐποχή operates in the interval between representation and judgment, effectively neutralizing the mechanism of affective engagement with ideology. The Ukrainian educational landscape requires supplementing cognitive critical thinking programs with an affective component, wherein Agrippa’s tropes serve as a practical method for cultivating epistemic defense across various levels of learning.

Author Biography

Bohdan Kozak, Vadym Hetman Kyiv National University of Economics (Kyiv-city, Ukraine)

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology

References

Arendt, H. (2005). Origins of totalitarianism. [V. Verloka & D. Korchakov, Trans.]. Dukh i Litera. [in Ukrainian].

Artymyshyn, P., & Kostiuk, O. (2019). Ideologema of the “russian world”: emergence, genesis, perception in Ukraine. [Analytical report]. Ivan Krypiakevych Institute of Ukrainian studies. [in Ukrainian].

Bullock, J. B. (2025). Skeptical Suspension in the Face of Disagreement. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 107 (2), 212-240. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2023-0095

Kahneman, D. (2021). Thinking Fast and Slow. [M. Yakovliev, trans.]. Kyiv: Nash format. [in Ukrainian].

KEBULADZE, V. (2024). Concept of ressentiment by Max Scheler and its contemporary relevance [in Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2024.02.105

Laruelle, M. (2015). The “Russian World”: Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination. Washington, D.C.: The Center on Global Interests

Machuca, D. E. (2021). Is Pyrrhonian suspension incompatible with doubt? Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 45, 27-55. https://doi.org/10.5840/msp20219299

Mannheim, K. (2008). Ideology and Utopia. [V. Shved, Trans.]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera. [in Ukrainian].

Obushnyi, M. (2020). “russian world” – a neo-imperial ideology of modern russia. Ukrainian Studies Almanac, (27), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-2626/2020.27.18. [In Ukrainian].

Scheler, M. (1915). Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen. In Abhandlungen und Aufsätze. Bd. 1, S. 39–236. Leipzig: Verlag der Weißen Bücher. [in German].

Sextus Empiricus. (2020). Outlines of Pyrrhonism (I, 1-13). [L. Zvonska, trans.; O. Khoma, ed.) [in Ukrainian]. Sententiae, 39(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent39.02.125.

Sim, S. (2019). Post-Truth, Scepticism & Power. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15876-7

Thorsrud, H. (2009). Ancient scepticism. Stocksfield: Acumen.

Yermolenko, A. M. (2021). “russian world” – the ideology of russian imperialism. [In Ukrainian]. In: “russian world” as a doctrine: origins, threats, methods. Philosophical Dialogues (iss. 21-22, pp. 15-26). Kyiv: H.S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, NAS of Ukraine.

Zborovska, X. (2023). Deconstruction of the myth of the “russian world” doctrine about Orthodoxy as the basis of Russian identity. Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 230–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-13 [In Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 8

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Kozak, B. (2026). Pyrrhonian Skepticism as a Tool of Epistemic Defense Against the Ideology of the “russian world”. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-9

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.