History training: a time of lost opportunities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2021-27-1-1

Keywords:

independence, history, popular sovereignty, power, social dynamics

Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of Ukraine's independence. Independence is viewed in two ways: as a formal legal act and as the real sovereignty of the people. The acquisition of real sovereignty is seen as a process of achieving social maturity (education) of the people in the course of its history. Shows the genealogy of the idea of an independent state and its connection with the era of modernity. The idea of state independence is not inherent in either the political consciousness or the practice of most of the era of civilization until the beginning of modernity. The thesis is substantiated that independence is an important social task of modern Ukrainian society, and not a fact of its life. The political and legal basis of independence is the sovereignty of the people. It is declared by the constitution, but did not take place de facto. The limited sovereignty of the people is associated with the usurpation of power and property in Ukraine by a closed ruling corporation. The article analyzes three main social forces that determined the development of the country during the period of independence. They are: the selfish interest of the new ruling class, the state aspiration of the protest movement (it is usually called national democratic) and the inertia of Soviet life of the bulk of the population. There is a meaningful connection between the way of governing in the Soviet system and the regime of the dominant corporation in contemporary Ukrainian history. The key feature of the ruling corporation is the implicit, hidden nature of its dominance. This destroys productive social dynamics, creates the preconditions for social collapse. Recently, after the second Maidan, there has been a lawsuit between the people – civil society – and the corporation of rulers and its social satellites for the organization of public life. It is concluded that only the elimination of the privileged position of the ruling corporation opens up the prospect of real democracy and the productive development of Ukraine in a globalized world.

Author Biography

Sergii Proleiev, National University "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"

Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor; Head of the Department of Philosophy of Culture, Ethics and Aesthetics, Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

References

Arendt, H. (2001). Origins of totalitarianism / transl. from English: V. Verloka, & D. Gorchakov. K: Spirit and letter. [In Ukrainian].

Bickerman, E. (1985). Institutions des séleucides / transl. from French: L. M. Gluskin. M .: Science. [In Russian].

Blum, D. W. (2007). National Identity and Globalization: Youth, State, and Society in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boichenko, M., & Rudenko Yu. (2020). Sources of state sovereignty and the idea of national identity. Politology Bulletin, (85), 158-173. [In Ukrainian].

Constitution of Ukraine (2021). https://www.president.gov.ua/ua/documents/constitution/konstituciya-ukrayini-rozdil-i. [In Ukrainian].

Gordon, D. (2016). Interview with former Prime Minister of Ukraine V. Fokin. Gordon Boulevard, 36 (592) (dated September 6, 2016). https://bulvar.com.ua/gazeta/archive/s592/pervyj-premer-ministr-nezavisimoj-ukrainy-vitold-fokin-v-belovezhskoj-pushche-burbulisu-ja-skazal-chto-vy-delaete-zachem- eltsina-spaivaete-a-on-ty-chto-ne-vidish-on-sam-etogo-hochet-udaril-l.html. [In Russian].

Gross domestic product of Ukraine (2019). Wikipedia. https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1 % 83% D1% 82% D1% 80% D1% 96% D1% 88% D0% BD% D1% 96% D0% B9_% D0% BF% D1% 80% D0% BE% D0% B4% D1% 83 % D0% BA% D1% 82_% D0% A3% D0% BA% D1% 80% D0% B0% D1% 97% D0% BD% D0% B8. [In Ukrainian].

How GDP has changed in purchasing power parity in post-socialist countries (2018). https://www.slovoidilo.ua/2018/03/21/infografika/ekonomika/yak-zminyuvavsya-vvp-parytetom-kupivelnoyi-spromozhnosti-postsoczialistychnyx-krayinax. [In Ukrainian].

Kozellek, R. (2006). Time layers / transl. from German: V. Shved. K .: Duh i litera. [In Ukrainian].

Mere, J. (2003). The principle of sovereignty. History and foundations of modern power / transl. from French: L. Kononovich. L .: Calvariia. [In Ukrainian].

Proleev S., Zborovskaya, K., Mironenko, R., & Kostenko, O. (2019). Philosophy as a school of life in the days of totalitarianism. Part II. The bridge today. Sententiae, 38(1), 172-197. https://doi.org/10.22240/sent38.0 1.172. [In Ukrainian].

Stalin, I. V. (1947). On the political strategy and tactics of the Russian Communists. Stalin IV Complete collection of works: in 18 vols. T. 5. M .: OGIZ; State Publishing House of Political Literature. [In Russian].

Downloads

Abstract views: 78

Published

2021-08-11

How to Cite

Proleiev, S. (2021). History training: a time of lost opportunities. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 27(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2021-27-1-1

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.