Pedagogy of freedom in axiological dimensions of education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2024-30-2-2Keywords:
“freedom-prohibition”, “natural-social”, educational models, axiosphere of education, humanistic concept of personalityAbstract
Philosophy and education have been closely interconnected since ancient times in their focus on nurturing the best human traits. Philosophy appeared not only as a science of the general principles and values of being and cognition, but also as a practice in the upbringing of virtues. The concept of “freedom” is given a central place in the humanistic concept of the personality. It is considered as the main condition for its existence and self-development. The degree of internal freedom was often considered in science as a criterion for the level of personal development. Pedagogy appears as the practice and theory of directing the efforts of the teacher and the student to improve the person during the educational process. From the point of view of the social process, the function of education as paideia is to prepare the individual for full participation in the life of his society. The purpose of the article of this article is a worldview of understanding and description of the main features of the pedagogy of freedom, in axiological dimensions. To achieve the set goal, a review of the most famous and influential concepts in the philosophy of education, such as the critical pedagogy of Paolo Freire, the humanistic psychology of Erich Fromm and Viktor Frankl, the educational models of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Maria Montessori, as well as their rethinking by modern Ukrainian researchers, was conducted. The modern scientific concept of the development of pedagogy of freedom has theoretical and practical significance for the justification of the modern development strategy of both the axiosphere of the educational space and society as a whole. Since a meaningful aspect of the value system is the conceptualization of freedom, the axiological dimensions of this phenomenon have a future, provided that the observer and the observed have a future.
References
Bilokopytov, V., El Guesab, K., (2024). Explanation of the concept «freedom» in migration transformations of the east and west. [In Ukrainian]. In Traditions and new scientific strategies in the context of global transformation of society: Scientific monograph. Part 1. (Pp. 317–342). Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-406-1-13
Brehin, M. H. (2013). Philosophical understanding of the transformation of the education system in the process of formation of the information society. [In Ukrainian] The thesis for the Degree of Candidate philos. Sciences. Ivano-Frankivsk. https://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/41667/Brehin_dis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Castells, M. (2007). Internet Galaxy. Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Trans. from English. E. Ganysh. Kyiv: Vakler.
Dichkіvs`ka, І. M. (2022). M. Montessori Pedagogy: Challenges of the Present, monograph. Rіvne: Volyn. oberegy [In Ukrainian]
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s Search for Meaning. New York: Washington Square Press.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Griffith, W. S. (1972). Paulo Freire: utopian perspectives on literacy education for revolu¬tion. In Grabowski, S. M. Paulo Freire: A Revolutionary Dilemma. For the adult educator. (Pp. 67–82). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
Hegel, G. V. F. (2000). Fundamentals of the Philosophy of Law, or Natural Law and Political Science. Trans. from German by R. Osadchuk and M. Kushnir. Kyiv: Univers.
Kalyuzhna, T. G. (2013) The praxeological dimension of pedagogical axiology. [In Ukrainian]. In M. O. Lazarev (ed.). Professional and creative self-realization of the future teacher in innovative education: monograph. (Pp. 45–69). Sumy: Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A.S. Makarenko.
Kant, I. (2016). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Korostianets, T. P., (2019). Freedom of choice as a pedagogical task. [In Ukrainian]. Pedagogy of creative personality formation in higher and secondary schools, 64(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2019.64-1.26
Martynets, L. A. (2013) Modern models of education. [In Ukrainian], Donetsk: DonNU.
Mead, M. (1964). Continuities in Cultural Evolution. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press
Rastrygina, А. М, Ivanenko, N. V. (2021). Pedagogy of Freedom in the Paradigmal Space of Modern Education and Upbringing: Monograph. [In Ukrainian]. Dnipro: FOP Seredniak T. K.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1918). Emile or Treatise on Education. Abridged, translated, and annotated by W. H. Payne. New York And London: D. Appleton and Company.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2001). The Social Contract, Or The Principles of Political Right. Trans. from French and English by O. Khoma. Kyiv: Port-Royal.
Stoliarenko, O., Stoliarenko, O., Magas, L. (2023). Sociocultural education and formation of spiritual values. [In Ukrainian]. Pedagogical Bulletin of Podillia, (2), 61-62.
Turchyn, I. M. (2018). Paulo Freire’s Educational Activity and Pedagogical Views. [In Ukrainian]. The thesis for the Degree of Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Lviv National University named after Ivan Franko, Lviv. https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/2020/dissertation/1826/dysertaciyaturchynim.pdf
Utyuz, I. G. (2013). Modern educational paradigms: socio-philosophical context. [In Ukrainian]. The thesis for the Degree of Dr. Philos. Sciences: 09.00.03, Kyiv. National University named after Taras Shevchenko. https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0513U000378
Vynnychuk, R. (2019). Pedagogical axiology in the context of humanitarian professional education. [In Ukrainian]. Origins of pedagogical mastery, (24), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-146x.2019.24.194599
Vyshnevskyi, O. (2006). Theoretical foundations of modern Ukrainian pedagogy. [In Ukrainian]. Drohobych: Kolo.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 11
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.