From sustainable development to degrowth: philosophical and educational strategies for sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-2Keywords:
degrowth, sustainable development, higher education, ecological education, all-around human personal development, deurbanizationAbstract
The article is dedicated to analyzing the philosophical and educational grounds for the sustainable development of humankind. The growth of human civilization is already recognized to have its strict natural limits, and that has resulted in the formulation of the concept of sustainable development as a strategy for the future of humankind. However, there is some discrepancy noted in the concept of sustainable development – in particular, it is the lack of fundamental consistency between its ‘economic’ and ‘ecological’ components. It is insufficient to consider the nature being valuable only as a base of resources, as means for social and economic development. As sustainability could only be based on some minimal conditions for living within the regenerative capacity of the planet’s ecosystems, it is evident that the current crisis is a crisis of senses, values and lifestyle no less than it is the crisis of industry and social demography. Sustainability is argued to require a new kind of society that would be able to decrease its growth and its excessive consumption habits. The article analyzes the concept of degrowth as a kind of more radical and practical supplement to the rather abstract idea of sustainable development: degrowth is defined as an ecologically sound development. That concept is also shown to present new challenges for higher education as a social institution tasked with constituting a human personality capable of living in a environmentally sound future. Thus, higher education is faced today with the challenge of shaping out not only knowledge and skills, but values and behavior patterns as well, by giving more attention to general culture, critical thinking and creativity and by increasing social responsibility for environmental protection and adopting lifestyle practices of degrowth and reduced consumption.
References
Copeland, R., & Grant, P. (2020). Google to Keep Employees Home Until Summer 2021 Amid Coronavirus Pandemic. In The Wall Street Journal, July 27th. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-to-keep-employees-home-until-summer-2021-amid-coronavirus-pandemic-11595854201.
Dansana, A. (2013). Higher Education and Sustainable Development: New Challenges and Opportunities. New Delhi: Regal Publications. xiv, 186 p.
Degrowth: New Roots for the Economy. Re-imagining the Future After the Corona Crisis: An Open Letter (2020). URL: https://www.degrowth.info/en/open-letter/.
Demaria, F., et al. (2013). What is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement. In Environmental Values. 22 (2), 191–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/0963 27113X13581561725194.
Gartenberg, Ch. (2020). Facebook extends remote work for employees through July 2021 // The Verge. August 6th. URL: https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/6/21357768/facebook-extends-remote-work-employees-july-2021-covid-19.
Gilman, R. (1991). The ecovillage challenge: The challenge of developing a community living in balanced harmony-with itself as well as nature-is tough, but attainable. In Context, 29, 10-14.
Goldoftas, B. (2006). The Green Tiger: The costs of ecological decline in the Philippines. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gorz, A. (2004). Métaporphoses du travail. Critique de la raison économique. Paris: Gal-limard.
Gorz, A. (2008). Écologica. Paris: Galilée.
Gough, S., & Scott, W. (2007). Higher Education and Sustainable Development: Paradox and Possibility. London; New York: Routledge.
Hoetmer, R., & Lang, M. (2019). Beyond Development: Stopping the machines of socio-ecological destruction and building alternative worlds. In Alternatives in A World of Crisis / Miriam Lang, Claus-Dieter König and Ada-Charlotte Regelmann (eds.). 2nd re-vised edition. Brussels, 256-306. URL: https://beyonddevelopment.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Alternatives-in-a-world-of-crisis-2019-2nd-ed1.pdf.
Ito, Sh. (1997). A Framework for Comparative Study of Civilizations. In Comparative Civilizations Review, 36 (36), 5-12.
Jeffrey, K., et al. (2016). The Happy Planet Index: 2016. A global index of sustainable well-being. London: New Economics Foundation. URL: http://happyplanetindex.org/s/hpi-data-2016.xlsx.
Lin, D., et al. (2018). Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018. In Resources, 7 (3), 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030058.
Martínez-Alier, J. (2012). Environmental Justice and Economic Degrowth: An Alliance between Two Movements. In Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23 (1), 51-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2011.648839.
Mattis, G. (2018). How to Improve Sustainability in Higher Education. – URL: https://www.qs.com/improve-sustainability-higher-education/.
Meadows, D., et al. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Meadows, D., et al. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Vermont, USA: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
Mielkov, Yu. (2019). Human-Dimensionality and Values of Higher Education: Strategies for The Future of Complexity and Sustainable Development. In Philosophy of Education, 24 (1), 79-96.
Myelkov, Yu. (2004). The Dialectics of Maria Zlotina. In TripleC: Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 1, 74-91.
Mok, K. H. (2006). Education Reform and Education Policy in East Asia. London; New York: Routledge.
Mu, R., et al. (2015). Theory and Practice of Sustainability in Higher Education – From the Perspective of Green University. In Asia-Pacific Energy Equipment Engineering Research Conference (AP3ER 2015), 484-487. URL: https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/19621.pdf.
Shephard, K. (2015). Higher Education for Sustainable Development. Basingstoke, Pal-grave; Macmillan.
Stepin, V. S. (2005). Theoretical knowledge. Dordrecht, Springer Verlag.
United Nations (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September 2002. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/478154/files/A_CONF-199_20-EN.pdf. iv, 167 p.
United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. – URL: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. 35 p.
Wackernagel, M., et al. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 (14), 9266-9271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142033699.
Weizsäcker, E., & Wijkman, А. (2018). Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet – A Report to the Club of Rome. New York: Springer Verlag.
Zinchenko, V. V., et al. (2019). Strategies of Higher Education under Internationalization for the Sustainable Development of Humankind: Methodical Recommendations (In Ukrainian) // Ed by V. V. Zinchenko. Kyiv: Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/978-617-7486-31-1-2019. URL: https://ihed.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Strategiy_VO_v_umovah_internac_IVO-2019-107p_avtors-kolektiv.pdf.
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 463
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
