Knowledge Management in Modern Democracies and the Issue of Truth

Authors

  • Panos Eliopoulos University of Peloponnese

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2016-19-2-6-14

Keywords:

truth, democracy, politics, citizen, knowledge management, pragmatism

Abstract

This paper explores the issue of knowledge management in modern Democracies, along with the demands posed by the truth problem. While a singular concept of truth can neither be epistemically safe, thus becoming flexible for partial or subjective demonstrations of its authentic or ideal value, nor applicable for every society, it can still take the form of a critical consensus, based on two new principles that are introduced here. The continuity of such a consensus that lies beyond the manipulation of an un-ethical rhetoric or demagogy can safeguard the existence of the Polis, without having to cease espousing typical logic syllogisms as well as the moral qualities that are essential for a meaningful way of social and political life. If not conducive to the collective good, the search for truth remains futile in the practical level of making people’s lives better and of enhancing their common bonds.

Author Biography

Panos Eliopoulos, University of Peloponnese

PhD, Professor, University of Peloponnese, Greece.

References

Aristotle (1887-1902). The Politics of Aristotle. Translated by W. L. Newman, 4 vols., University Press, Oxford.

Cicero (1933). De Natura Deorum & Academica. Translated by H. Rackham, Harvard University Press, (Loeb).

Dahl, R. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven-London.

Diels, H. and Kranz,W. (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th edition, Weidmann, Berlin.

Field, H. (1986). The Deflationary Conception of Truth. In: G. MacDonald and C. Wright (eds.), Fact, Science and Morality, Blackwell, Oxford.

Horwich, P. (ed.) (1994). Theories of Truth. Dartmouth, New York.

James, W. (1907). Pragmatism, A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Popular Lectures on Philosophy. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York.

James, W. (1909). The Meaning of Truth, A Sequel to 'Pragmatism'. Longmans, Green, and Company, New York.

Jill, F. (2005). A Democracy of Distinction. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Joachim, H. H. (1906). The Nature of Truth. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Katsimanis Kyriakos (1979). Praktiki filosofia kai politico ithos tou Sokrati. France, Université de Paris - Sorbonne - Paris IV.

Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford University Press, New York.

Künne W. (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Clarendon, Oxford.

Lansford, T. (2007). Democracy. Benchmark Books, NY.

Pelegrinis Theodosios (2004). Lexiko tis Filosofias. Ellinika Grammata, Athens.

Platon (1962-1982). Oeuvres Complètes, Tome I-XIII, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.

Pomeroy A. (1999). Arius Didymus: Epitome of Stoic Ethics. Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta.

Wright, C. (1992). Truth and Objectivity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wilson, E. (1976). Academic Vigilantism and the Political Significance of Sociobiology. In: Bioscience, 26, 187-190.

Downloads

Abstract views: 333

Published

2016-12-27

How to Cite

Eliopoulos, P. (2016). Knowledge Management in Modern Democracies and the Issue of Truth. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 19(2), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2016-19-2-6-14

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.