Discrimination against Women as a Manifestation of Social Inequality through the Lens of Feminist Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-14Keywords:
social inequality, discrimination, intersectionality, justice, universal female experience, feminism, engaged pedagogyAbstract
Relevance. The article explores the problem of women’s discrimination through the lens of contemporary feminist philosophy. The author analyses the evolution of feminist thought from the first to the third wave, revealing how the understanding of social equality and freedom has changed within broader socio-cultural transformations. The purpose of this article is to focus on the theoretical aspects of the problem of women’s discrimination from the perspective of feminist criticism, to show its origins and transformation in different versions of feminism, and to highlight the problem of intersectionality of different forms of discrimination, including in the educational space. Methods. Particular attention is devoted to the transition from liberal feminism – focused on legal equality and civil liberties, and rooted in the philosophical ideas of John Stuart Mill – to Marxist and psychoanalytic approaches, which interpret women’s oppression because of structural inequality, economic exploitation, and symbolic domination. Through comparative analysis, it demonstrates that feminist critique of social inequality extends beyond a narrowly gendered discourse, transforming into a broader humanistic program of social emancipation aimed at constructing a just society. Novelty. Central to the discussion are the notions of the “universal female experience”, its critique within the framework of intersectionality, and the influence of cultural and economic factors on the formation of social roles (“sexual politics”). The article shows how contemporary feminist theory integrates the issues of gender and class inequality, emphasizing the multidimensional nature of discrimination. Conclusion. It is underlined that overcoming social inequality is possible only through an inclusive model of society that ensures equal access to education, employment, and political participation regardless of gender, class, race, nationality, or religion. The paper highlights the prospects of “engaged pedagogy”, which seeks not only to defend women’s rights but also to affirm the principles of social justice and human dignity.
References
Andersen, L. M., & Collins, P. H. (Eds). (2016). Race, Class and Gender: an Anthology. Ninth edition. Boston: Cengage learning.
Barker, Ch., & Jane, E. (2018). Cultural Studies. Theory and Practice. 5-th edition. New York: Sage.
Boychenko, N. (2023). Principlism in bioethics: features and possible limitations. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 29(1), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309- 1606-2023-29-1-11
Chanter, T. (1998). Kristeva, Julia. (1941–). In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-DE012-1
Federici, S. (1975). Wages against Housework. Power of Women Collective & Falling Wall Press.
Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York: W.W. Norton press
Hooks, B. (1982). Ain’t I a Woman. Black Women and Feminism. London: Pluto press.
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routlege.
Kristeva, J. (1984). Revolution in Poetic Language. (M. Waller, trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Mill, J. S. (2001). The Subjection of Women (V. Trylis, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. In J. S. Mill, On Liberty: Essays. (Pp. 365–462). Kyiv: Solomiya Pavlychko “Osnovy” Publishing House.
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual Politics. New York: Columbia University Press
Morozov, A., & Shapovalov, V. (2023). Ontological foundations of moral culture. Part I. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Cultural Studies, 2(13), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.17721/ UCS.2023.2(13).09
Morozov, A., Shapovalov, V., & Hudkov, S. (2024). Ontological foundations of moral culture. Part II. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian Cultural Studies, 1(14), 51-59. https://doi. org/10.17721/UCS.2024.1(14).08
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. The capabilities approach. Cambridge university press
Oliver, K. (1991). Kristeva’s Imaginary Father and the Crisis in the Paternal Function. Diacritics, 21(2/3), 43-63
Pavlychko, S. (2002). Feminism. Kyiv: Solomiya Pavlychko “Osnovy” Publishing House. [In Ukrainian].
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Williams, K. C. (1994). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and violence against women of color. In: M. A. Fineman, & R. Mykitiuk. (Eds). The Public Nature of Private Violence. (Pp. 93-118). New York: Routledge.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.