Human in the Shadow of Algorithm in thе Context of Philosophy of Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-5Keywords:
philosophy, philosophy of education, human being, algorithm, artificial intelligence, , teacher (mentor)-student, information, knowledge, wisdomAbstract
Relevance. The article examines the influence of artificial intelligence on contemporary education and the role of the human being within conditions of algorithm-driven learning. The purpose of the article is to clarify the conceptual balance between technology and humanity, between algorithm and thinking. Methods. It analyzes the philosophical foundations of autonomous thinking, the ethical challenges, and the risks of losing critical capacities in the process of interacting with technology. The study substantiates the need to combine human mentorship with technological tools in order to preserve the humanistic dimension of education, where artificial intelligence is regarded as a means of expanding human capabilities. Novelty. It emphasizes the boundaries between technological efficiency and the autonomy of human thought, as well as the ethical principles guiding AI integration into the educational process. The concept of the “human in the shadow of the algorithm” is conceptualized within the framework of the philosophy of education. Education is presented not merely as a space for knowledge transmission, but as a domain for cultivating critical, moral, and creative thinking that resists the risks of algorithmization. The article analyzes classical and contemporary approaches to the philosophy of education–from Socrates and Immanuel Kant to Jürgen Habermas and Martha Nussbaum–and reveals the dangers of algorithmic learning, which may diminish autonomy and critical reflection. Real case studies demonstrate how algorithms can reproduce social inequality, discrimination, or distort pedagogical assessment. At the same time, it is shown that, with ethical application, AI can serve as a catalyst for a new quality of education grounded in dialogue, empathy, and cooperation. Conclusion. Education must remain a space for human thought, where technology serves the human being rather than the reverse. AI should be an opportunity, not a threat–an instrument that supports the teacher but does not displace their role as mentor. The future of education in the age of AI lies in the responsible integration of technology that preserves freedom of mind, ethical awareness, and the creative nature of the human being.
References
Allen, G. (2016). Hierarchy of knowledge – from data to wisdom. International Journal of Current Research in Multidisciplinary, (2), 1–23.
Andrushchenko, V. (ed.). (2021). Philosophy of Education (2nd ed.). Kyiv: National Peda-gogical Dragomanov University. [in Ukrainian].
Dewey, J. (2003). Democracy and Education (M. Oliynyk, I. Bosak, G. Pekhnyk, trans.; I. Farion, ed.). Lviv: Litopys. [in Ukrainian].
Editorial. (2024). AI in schools: Dutch study warns algorithms may discriminate against students. NL Times. https://nltimes.nl/2024/05/13/ai-schools-dutch-study-warns-algorithms-may-discriminate-students.
Gluchman, V. (2018). Nussbaum’s philosophy of education as the foundation for human de-velopment. Human Affairs, 28, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0026
Kruhlui, D. (2020). The use of DIKW methodology for educational proposals in implementing innovative learning. [in Ukrainian]. Science and Education, (4), 48–53. https://doi.org/ 10.24195/2414-4665-2020-4-6.
Kuklin, O., Ivanova, I., & Borovyk, T. (2024). Modelling the integration of artificial intelli¬gence into the educational environment. [in Ukrainian]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 103, 207–232. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v103i5.5735.
Lozovyi, V., & Sidak, L. (2006). Self-development of personality in philosophical reflection and social practice. Kharkiv: Pravo. [in Ukrainian].
Mühlhoff, R., & Henningsen, M. (2025). Chatbots im Schulunterricht: Wir testen das Fobizz-Tool zur automatischen Bewertung von Hausaufgaben. Cornell University. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06651
Plato. (1999). Dialogues (Y. Kobiv et al., trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].
Titeradzh, N., & Malchevska, O. (2025). I asked ChatGPT for help – and it told me how to kill myself. [in Ukrainian]. BBC News Ukrainian. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/ articles/cp3xl5y43dvo
Vysotska, O. (2024). Virtue as an important factor in the formation of human identity: Conceptual transformations. [in Ukrainian]. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Bulletin. Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology Series, 4(63), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.63.315202.
Wu, D. (2025). AI safety tool sparks student backlash after flagging art as porn, delet¬ing emails. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/ 2025/09/24/students-lawsuit-ai-tool-gaggle/.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.