Cognitive Practice in the Era of the Internet of Things: Ave, Homo Connectus!
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-7Keywords:
Internet of Things, cognitive practice, autonomy, philosophy of IoT, service dependence, Autonomy-Enabling Ratio, Homo connectusAbstract
This article offers a philosophical investigation of how the Internet of Things (IoT) reconfigures cognitive practice, reshaping the structure of knowledge, decision-making, and subjectivity in the digital environment. It demonstrates that IoT is not merely a technological infrastructure but a mechanism that embeds cognition within algorithmic and service-based systems, reducing epistemic autonomy and deepening dependence on platforms and automated protocols. The study conceptualizes Homo connectus as a new socio-technical form of subjectivity shaped by platform dependency, technical mediation of action, algorithmic production of meaning, and systemic constraints on reflective decision-making. These transformations affect education, knowledge production, and professional competence by introducing structural reliance on service ecosystems and reducing individual cognitive sovereignty. To analyze these dynamics, the article introduces the Autonomy-Enabling Ratio (AER), a novel metric for assessing the extent of cognitive autonomy within connected environments. AER captures the ratio between autonomous and externally regulated scenarios of knowledge, education, and professional practice, providing a tool to identify algorithmic overreach and the erosion of human agency. This work contributes to philosophical discourse by framing IoT as both a technical and epistemic phenomenon, critically examining its implications for human autonomy, meaning-making, and social interaction in the context of pervasive digital infrastructures.
References
Alfa Aviation Group. (2024, January 15). The impact of automation on airline pilots. AAG Philippines Flight Training Center. https://aag.aero/the-impact-of-automation-on-airline-pilots/
Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Duke University Press.
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ashton, K. (2009). That ‘Internet of Things’ thing. FID Journal, 22(7), 97–114. https://www.rfidjournal.com/expert-views/that-internet-of-things-thing/73881/
Capasso, M., & Umbrello, S. (2022). Responsible nudging for social good: New healthcare skills for AI-driven digital personal assistants. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10062-z
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
Cha, M. (2023). Introducing a new era for the Alexa smart home / Amazon. https://www. aboutamazon.com/news/devices/amazon-smart-home-announcements-2023
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Coeckelbergh, M. (2015). Environmental skill: Motivation, knowledge, and the possibility of a nonalienated relation to nature. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714158
Cotter, K., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2020). Algorithmic knowledge gaps: A new horizon of (digital) inequality. International Journal of Communication, 14, 745–765. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12450
Dekker, S. W. A., & Woods, D. D. (2024). Wrong, strong, and silent: What happens when automated systems with high autonomy and high authority misbehave? Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 15553434241240849. https://safetyinsights.org/2024/11/18/wrong-strong-and-silent-what-happens-when-automated-systems-with-high-autonomy-and-high-authority-misbehave/
Dourish, P., & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA; London, England: MIT Press.
Eigner, A., & Stary, C. (2023). The role of Internet-of-Things for service transformation. SAGE Open, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231159281
European Union. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689
Fitbit. (2024). Health tracking insights. https://www.fitbit.com/global/us/technology
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gebru, B., Zeleke, L., Blankson, D., & Nabil, M. (2022). A review on human–machine trust evaluation: Human-centric and machine-centric perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(6), 1254–1269. https://doi.org/10.1109/ THMS.2022.3144956
Greengard, S. (2015). The internet of things. MIT Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Hui, Y. (2021). Recursivity and contingency. Rowman & Littlefield.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA; London, England: MIT Press.
International Energy Agency. (2024). Energy and AI. https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai
IoT Analytics. (2024). State of IoT Summer 2024. https://iot-analytics.com/product/state-of-iot-summer-2024/
IoT Analytics. (2025). Hannover Messe 2025 – the latest Industrial IoT/Industry 4.0 Trends. https://iot-analytics.com/product/hannover-messe-2025-industrial-iot-industry- 4-0-trends/
Janiesch, C., Fischer, M., Winkelmann, A., & Nentwich, V. (2020). Specifying autonomy in the Internet of Things: The autonomy model and notation. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 17, 159–194. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.09239
Kempt, H., Colombo, C. F., & Nagel, S. K. (2024). Human–machine relations and relational autonomy. Journal of Human-Machine Communication, 5(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.9.5
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2020). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001
Kumar, N. (2025, July 5). Internet of Things (IoT) Statistics: Market & Growth Data. DemandSage. https://www.demandsage.com/internet-of-things-statistics/
Lederman, D. (2024, May 22). Three in five students regularly use AI, survey finds. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/06/28/one-third-college-instructors-are-using-genai-heres
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self: A sociology of self-tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12495
Manwaring, K., & Hall, C. (2019). Legal, social and human rights challenges of the Internet of Things in Australia. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3464277
McKinsey & Company. (2020, December 16). How artificial intelligence will impact K-12 teachers. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/how-artificial-intelligence-will-impact-k-12-teachers
McKinsey & Company. (2022, July). Industry 4.0: Reimagining manufacturing operations after COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/ what-are-industry-4-0-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-and-4ir
McKinsey Global Institute. (2021). The Internet of Things: Catching up to an accelerating opportunity. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/iot-value-set-to-accelerate-through-2030-where-and-how-to-capture-it
McKinsey Global Institute. (2023, November). Don’t ask me, AI just work here: Automation potential in production occupations. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/ sustainable-inclusive-growth/charts/dont-ask-me-ai-just-work-here
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of Things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016
Monteiro, E., & Parmiggiani, E. (2019). Synthetic knowing: The politics of the Internet of Things. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13799
Mumford, L. (2010). Technics and civilization. University of Chicago Press.
OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
OECD. (2024). Digital economy outlook 2024. https://www.oecd.org/digital/digital-economy-outlook/
Shoikova, E., Krumova, M., & Kovatcheva, E. (2016). Learning in a smart city environment. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(1), 27–34. http://www.davidpublisher. com/Public/uploads/Contribute/584138586e4a6.pdf
Signify. (2023). Philips Hue: Smart lighting for connected homes. https://www.philips-hue. com/en-us/explore-hue/how-it-works
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Tesla. (2024). Vehicle feature subscriptions and connectivity. https://www.tesla.com/support/connectivity
Ubisense Ltd., & Arlington Research. (2023). IoT in manufacturing 2023: Location-based services as an imperative for survival [White paper]. https://ubisense.com/a-rapid-increase-in-iot-adoption-manufacturing-iot-in-2023/
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in higher education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-less-10-schools-and-universities-have-formal-guidance-ai
U.S. Department of Defense. (2013). Unmanned systems integrated roadmap: FY2013– 2038 (Report No. DOD-2013-15). U.S. Department of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/ sti/pdfs/ADA592015.pdf
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi. org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=Falkge0XaxoC
Viasat, Inc. (2024). The state of industrial IoT in 2024 [White paper]. https://www.viasat. com/content/dam/us-site/enterprise/perspectives/documents/Viasat-State-of-IoT-in-2024-Report.pdf
Weinberger, D. (2011). Too big to know: Rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room is the room. Basic Books.
World Economic Forum. (2018). The future of jobs report 2018. https://www.weforum. org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2018
World Economic Forum. (2025a). Education 4.0 framework. https://initiatives.weforum. org/reskilling-revolution/education-4-0-insights
World Economic Forum. (2025b). How education can adapt to prepare learners for tomorrow’s demands [Interview]. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/future-of-education-and-skills/
Yadav, P., Li, Q., Brown, A., & Mortier, R. (2019). Network service dependencies in commodity Internet-of-Things devices. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI ’19) (pp. 202–212). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3302505.3310082
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Zuboff, S., & Tsalikis, C. (2019, August 15). Shoshana Zuboff on the undetectable, indecipherable world of surveillance capitalism [Interview]. Centre for International Governance Innovation. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/shoshana-zuboff-undetectable-indecipherable-world-surveillance-capitalism/
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
