Philosophy of business as cross-disciplinary educational component

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-11

Keywords:

philosophy of business, cross-disciplinary educational component, economic education, administrative law education, culturological education

Abstract

The article presents structural-functional analysis for the socio-practical potential of such educational component as philosophy of business, as well as research the degree of its impact on evolution of strategic thinking abilities, progress of creative potential, values and attitudes of students. Therefore, in the text of the article is outlined the author’s structure of the analyzed educa­tional component, that is relevant for socio-economic sphere of contemporary Ukraine and, at the same time, one that will motivate younger generation to apply cross-disciplinary knowledge for improving the national business sphere and for making progress in economic culture of Ukrainian society in general. The structure of analyzed educational component must include: studying the philosophy of business problem field in the context of game theory; analysis of business ontological specifics as well as related risks and success criteria; de­scription the philosophical aspects of branding and business-leadership; analy­sis of such phenomena connection as capital, property and wealth; determining the basics of culture, ethics and social responsibility of business, its role in the structure of social institutions; and also studying of such instruments for strate­gic thinking evolution as theory of game Go and 36 ancient Chinese stratagems; and, finally, a detection of essential transformations for business-processes in conditions of digitalization and active artificial intelligence development. So we consider that socio-creative manifestations of that educational discipline should be analyzed, first of all, on three main levels: economic, administrative law and culturological. Article proves that in each of these professional educa­tional areas, philosophy of business, as separate educational component, pro­vides specific functional effects, significantly supplementing and improving cur­ricula with additional knowledge and competencies that increases preparation level of modern specialists, creates opportunities for their better understanding of business practical value for national and global economies.

Author Biography

Tetiana Hlushko, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy

References

Avraamov P. (2019) Strategy of Go. Ancient game and modern business, or how to win in competition / trans. from Russian O. Kozhushko. Kharkiv: Fabula.

Bailey S., Milligan A. (2020) Myths of Branding: A Brand Is Just a Logo, and Other Popular Misconceptions / trans. English by I. Mashyko. Kharkiv: Fabula.

Blommaert, T., & Van den Broek S. (2017). Management in Singularity: From Linear to Exponential Management. Alphen Aan Den Rijn: Vakmedianet.

Campbell, A., & Tawadey, K. (1992). Mission and Business Philosophy. Oxford: Heinemann Professional Publishing.

Dubrovskyi V. (2017) From dignity to success: how to build an economic miracle on Ukrainian ground. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Ferguson N. (2020) Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die / trans. from English. Kyiv: Nash Format.

Hlushko, T. P. (2021) Business as an Instrument for National Economy Upgrading: So¬cio-Philosophical Analysis. Scholarly Disputes in Philosophy, Sociology, Political Sci¬ence, and History amidst Globalization and Digitalization. Venice: Ca’Foscari Univer¬sity, 138–139.

Hlushko T.P. (2008) Philosophy of economics in the structure of modern humanitarian education. Scientific monograph. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 84-120.

Hlushko T.P. (2019) Philosophical foundations of business through the lens of game theory. Bulletin of the National Aviation University. Series: Philosophy. Culturology 1(29), 10–15.

Hlushko T.P. (2021) Side program of the academic discipline for students of the OKR «bachelor» specialty 281 «public management and administration» of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University. http://dphs.univ.kiev.ua/files/2021-2022/ robprog2021-22_017.pdf

Ibarra, H. (2015). Act Like a Leader, Think Like a Leader. Harvard: Harvard Business Re¬view Press.

Mises, von L. (2008). The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality. Canada: Van Nostrand Company.

Peccei, А. (1977). The Human Quality. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Pryiatelchuk, A. O. (2012). The structure of the philosophy of economics. Humanitarian Bulletin of Zaporizhzhya State Engineering Academy (48), 70–78.

Reinert, E. S. (2019). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor / trans. from English by I. Sinaiko. K.: Samit-Knyha.

Rumelt, R. (2020). Good strategy. Bad strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters / trans. from English by T. Mukhamedshina. Kharkiv: Fabula.

Senger, H. (2006). The 36 Stratagems for Business: Achieve your Objectives through Hidden and Unconventional Strategies and Tactics. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Business; London: Cyan.

Pous, de M. (2021). 1994: The Caux Round Table – Principles for Business. https://www.iofc.ch/stories/1994-caux-round-table

Woiceshyn, J. (1992). A Philosophical Approach to Business Education. The Canadian Jour¬nal of Higher Education, Vol. XXII-2, 73–91.

Downloads

Abstract views: 35

Published

2022-08-25

How to Cite

Hlushko, T. (2022). Philosophy of business as cross-disciplinary educational component. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 28(1), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-11

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.