Appealing to Heidegger's Fourfold Contemplation in Post-Anthropocene Environmental Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-10Keywords:
environmental education, Anthropocene, scholé activity, Heideggerian fourfold contemplation, capitalist epistemologies, Martin HeideggerAbstract
Relevance. If the environment continues to deteriorate, the Anthropocene could be a short geological epoch followed by humankind’s extinction. Some might assume that education should shoulder the responsibility for solving the problem – or at least prepare young people for life in a post-anthropocentric world. The formal education systems still tend to reproduce the current speciesist epistemology. This can be understood as a continuation of knowledge in the service of capitalism, which is not conducive to helping raise students’ awareness of a posthuman ecosystem. Purpose. This essay critiques the role of formal education in addressing the environmental crisis in the Anthropocene, arguing that institutionalized education perpetuates capitalist epistemologies that exploit nature as a standing reserve. Methods. As an antithesis, this paper proposes scholé – inactivity and contemplation – as a pathway to environmental stewardship, rooted in Greco-Roman philosophies and extended through Pieper’s concepts. Calculative thinking, which frames the world instrumentally, is also positioned against contemplation owing to the latter’s secularization. Novelty. Heidegger’s “fourfold” (earth, sky, divinities, mortals) is presented as a framework for metaphysical contemplation that suspends calculative thinking, fosters poetic dwelling, and reveals concealed meanings in nature. Conclusion. Heideggerian fourfold contemplation, as a scholé activity, should be encouraged in light of formal education’s ambiguity with regard to addressing the climate crisis caused by capitalism’s self-correcting engine. This article outlines a classroom design that applies Heidegger’s fourfold to everyday objects; two photographic examples are used to illustrate how Heideggerian contemplation can be implemented.
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment. (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. https://monoskop.org/images/2/27/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. (R. Nice, Trans.). London: SAGE Publications. https://monoskop.org/images/8/82/Bourdieu_Pierre_Passeron_Jean_Claude_Reproduction_in_Education_Society_and_Culture_1990.pdf
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227345300_Schooling_in_Capitalist_America_Educational_Reform_and_the_Contradictions_of_Economic_Life_By_Samuel_Bowles_and_Herbert_Gintis_New_York_Basic_Books_1976_Pp_340_1395
Dreyfus, H. L. (2006). Heidegger on the connection between nihilism, art, technology, and politics. In C. B. Guignon (Ed.) The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. (Pp. 345–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (2016). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Lectures at Dartmouth College, 1980. (G. Burchell, Trans.). (H.-P. Fruchard, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Hadot, P. (2011). Philosophy as a way of life. (M. Chase, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing. https://ascetology.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pierre-hadot-philosophy-as-a-way-of-life-spiritual-exercises-from-socrates-to-foucault-1.pdf
Han, B. C. (2017). The Scent of Time: A philosophical essay on the art of lingering. (D. Steuer, trans.). Cambridge: Polity.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans.). San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins. http://pdf-objects.com/files/Heidegger-Martin-Being-and-Time-trans.-Macquarrie-Robinson-Blackwell-1962.pdf
Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on thinking (J. M. Anderson & E. H. Freund, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/Discourse-on-Thinking.pdf
Heidegger, M. (1971). The turning. (K. R. Maly, Trans.). Research in Phenomenology, 1, 3–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24654417
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York and London: Garland Publishing. https://monoskop.org/images/4/44/Heidegger_Martin_The_Question_Concerning_Technology_and_Other_Essays.pdf
Heidegger, M. (1981). Why do I stay in the provinces?. In T. Sheehan (Ed.). Heidegger: The man and the thinker. (Pp. 27–30). Chicago: Precedent Publishing. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e265eb50aee2d7e8a81ae69/t/61379b746fd4455461b55c04/1631034251217/heidegger_the_man_and_the_thinker.pdf
Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, language and thought. (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e265eb50aee2d7e8a81ae69/t/6010cd7289e92877adac0e7d/1611713913485/Poetry__Language__Thought__Perennial_Classics.pdf
Kalimtzis, K. (2017). An inquiry into the philosophical concept of scholê. Leisure as a Political End. London and Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kwan, T. W. (2021). Paihuai yu tianren zhiji: Haidege de zhexue silu [The way between being and man: On Heidegger’s philosophical detours]. Linking Books. [in Chinese].
Pedersen, H. (2025). Post-anthropocentric pedagogies: Purposes, practices, and insights for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(2), 344–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2012345
Peim, N., & Stock, N. (2022). Education after the end of the world: How can education be viewed as a hyperobject?. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(3), 251–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.2017881
Pieper, J. (1998). Happiness and contemplation. New York: St. Augustine’s Press.
Saito, K. (2024). Slow down: The degrowth manifesto. (B. Bergstrom, Trans.). New York: Astra Publishing House.
Sellars, J. (2020a). Lessons in Stoicism: What ancient philosophers teach us about how to live. London: Penguin Books.
Sellars, J. (2020b). The fourfold remedy: Epicurus and the art of happiness. London: Penguin Books.
Seneca. (2023). How to do the right thing: An ancient guide to treating people fairly. (Kaster, R. A., Ed. and Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steel, S. (2014). On the need for Dionysian education in schools today. Educational Theory, 64(2), 123–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12053
Wrathall, M. (2006). How to read Heidegger? New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company. https://archive.org/details/mark-wrathall-how-to-read-heidegger
Young, J. (2006). The fourfold. In C. B. Guignon (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to Heidegger (pp. 373–392). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.