Teaching philosophy in schools: international experience, problems and prospects in Ukraine

Authors

  • Mykhailo Romanenko Communal institution of higher education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council» (Dnipro-city, Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1495-6762

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-4

Keywords:

school philosophy, teaching philosophy, Philosophy for Children, critical thinking, democratic education, civic responsibility, Ukraine

Abstract

Relevance. The problem of teaching philosophy at school as a condition for the formation of autonomous thinking in the context of the transformation of the modern educational space, which is characterized by the strengthening of the role of competency models, the standardization of education and the growing complexity of the socio-cultural environment, is analyzed. In this context, a contradiction emerges between the declared goals of developing critical thinking, the ability for reasoned judgment, and responsible participation in public life, and the limited possibilities for their realization in educational practice. The purpose of the article is to provide a philosophical and educational analysis of the possibilities and limitations of integrating philosophy into school education through the examination of international experience and the identification of structural and methodological constraints of its implementation in the Ukrainian context. The research methodology is based on a combination of hermeneutic, comparative, and conceptual approaches, which makes it possible to interpret the philosophical foundations of education, analyze international educational practices, and identify the specific features of their adaptation within the Ukrainian educational system. The scientific novelty lies in substantiating the teaching of philosophy not merely as an academic discipline, but as a principle of organizing the educational process in which thinking becomes the central outcome of education, as well as in identifying the contradiction between the goals of developing critical thinking and the lack of appropriate institutional and pedagogical conditions for their realization. Conclusion. In the Ukrainian educational context there is a gap between the goals of developing thinking and the institutional conditions for their implementation, which limits the formation of the ability for judgment as a key educational outcome. The prospects for the development of philosophy in school education are associated with the establishment of dialogical forms of learning, the implementation of inquiry-based approaches, the strengthening of the role of the humanities, and the reconsideration of education as a space for forming the capacity for judgment, responsibility, and participation in the shared world.

Author Biography

Mykhailo Romanenko, Communal institution of higher education «Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education» of the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council» (Dnipro-city, Ukraine)

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy

References

Andrushchenko, V. P. (2005). Philosophy of education of the 21st century: search for priorities [in Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, (1), 5–16. https://enpuir.udu.edu.ua/entities/publication/ac9a8e95-20e8-4091-a0e3-219f82a4088c

Kremen, V. H. (2023). Philosophy of human-centeredness in the system of modern values [in Ukrainian]. Herald of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 5(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2023.5126

Romanenko, K. M., & Romanenko, M. I. (2025). Glocalization and good governance: dialectical understanding of openness in the public sector through education [in Ukrainian]. Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education Herald. Series: Public Management and Administration, 8(1), 78–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54891/2786-698X-2025-1-9

Romanenko, M. I. (2011). Filosofiia osvity yak haluz znannia [Philosophy of education as a field of knowledge]. Filosofiia ta politolohiia v konteksti suchasnoi kultury, (2), 341–347. https://fip.dp.ua/index.php/FIP/article/view/642

Romanenko, M. I., Vysotska, O. Y. (2020). Humanism versus authoritarianism of Ukrainian education in the context of the development of the modern philosophical and educational paradigm. Perspectives. Socio-political journal, (2), 31–40. http://dspace.pdpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/12700/1/Romanenko.pdf

Savchenko, O. Ya. (2018). Law of Ukraine “On Education”: commentary in the context of primary education reform [in Ukrainian]. Pochatkova shkola, (1), 1–4.

Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future. New York: Penguin Books. https://pensarelespaciopublico.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/hannah-arendt-between-past-and-future.pdf

Atnelie, M., Sulastri, S., Sari, T. P., Rostari, T. E., & Muryanti, T. (2026). Application of Educational Philosophy in School Practice: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(1), 216–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1334

Bialystok, L., Norris, T., & Pinto, L. E. (2019). Teaching and learning philosophy in Ontario high schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(5), 678–697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1563632

Gregory, M., Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children. London: Routledge.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jurgen-habermas-theory-of-communicative-action-volume-1.pdf

Lam, C.-M. (2023). A philosophy for children approach to professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 53(2), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2022.2056143

Lipman, M. (2003). Philosophy goes to school. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://sixthform.painsley.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Drama-why-democracy-needs-the-humanities.pdf

Pratheesh, P. (2025). Transforming Teaching Philosophies: A New Era in High School Education. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 12, 113-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v12p11

Riznyk, V., & Nosachenko, V. (2025). Philosophy of education as a basis for the development of innovative pedagogical technologies. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 11(1), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69587/pemtt/1.2025.80

Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Melbourne: ACER Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED387454

UNESCO. (2007). Philosophy: A school of freedom – Teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154173

Varricchio, I. (2025). Ways of relating philosophy to society and contemporary issues: Curricula constructions of the philosophy subject in the Nordic upper secondary school. Journal of Social Science Education, 24(4), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-7739

Villarin, W. A., & Villacruz, J. P. (2025). Educational philosophies and teaching methods challenges of junior high school teachers. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(6), 1514–1520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120600128

Abstract views: 3

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Romanenko, M. (2026). Teaching philosophy in schools: international experience, problems and prospects in Ukraine. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-4

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.