Translation as (Mis)interpretation: The Case of the Philosophy of the Late Fichte
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2024-30-1-16Keywords:
faith, knowledge, science of knowledge, God, image, religionAbstract
The article examines the essays dedicated to the philosophy of the late Fichte, specifically to the concept of the image and the absolute (Netrebiak, 2022 and 2024). It demonstrates the issues arising, on the one hand, from neglecting the context of Fichte’s philosophy in attempts to interpret his late philosophy and, on the other hand, from misinterpreting Fichte’s terminology and incorrect translations of his texts. Additionally, it refutes the claim regarding the theological context of Fichte’s philosophy, which consistently developed Kant’s program of transcendental philosophy. This program aimed at reforming Christian epistemology and ethics by considering knowledge as the source of faith. The article also deals with Kant’s thesis on the setting aside (aufheben) of knowledge in order to make room for faith (KrV, B XXX) in the context of Luther’s translation of the biblical verb καταργεῖν (Rom. 3:31) as Kant’s claim for a reformation of Christianity. The path of Christianity (and the Christian philosopher) is the justification of knowledge (law, norms) through faith. Kant, however, radically rethinks this stance by justifying faith through knowledge. At bottom, Kant revises Christianity by rejecting transcendence, the supposed source of epistemic and practical world relations, leading to his critique of Christian ethics and its golden rule of morality whithin his doctrine of categorical imperatives. From this perspective, Fichte merely continues Kant’s program of transcendental philosophy, offering a path from knowledge to faith. Attempts to put forward a theological interpretation of Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre fundamentally contradict both the early and later versions of the Wissenschaftslehre, as they disregard the epistemological context in which Fichte consistently developed Kant’s revolutionary equating of objective validity with objective reality, even though he employed his own original theoretical vocabulary.
References
Cesa, C. (2008). Introduzione a Fichte. Roma/Bari: Editori Laterza.
Danz C. (2000) Das Bild als Bild. Aspekte der Phänomenologie Fichtes und ihre religion¬stheoretischen Konsequenzen. Fichte-Studien, 18, 1–17.
Drechsler, J. (1955). Fichtes Lehre vom Bild. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Fichte, J. G. (1986a). Die Wissenschaftslehre. Zweiter Vortrag im Jahre 1804 vom 16. April bis 8. Juni. Gereinigte Fassung hrsg. v. R. Lauth und J. Widmann. Hamburg: Meiner.
Fichte, J. G. (1986b). Briefe. Hrsg. v. Manfred Buhr. Leipzig: Reclam.
Fichte, J. G. (1994). Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo. Hrsg. v. Erich Fuchs. Hamburg: Meiner.
Fichte, J. G. (1997). Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre als Handschrift für seine Zuhörer (1794). Einl. und Reg. von Wilhelm G. Jacobs. Hamburg: Meiner.
Fichte, J. G. (2000). Die Bestimmung des Menschen. Auf der Grundlage der Ausgabe von Fritz Medicus revidiert von Horst D. Brandt. Hamburg: Meiner.
Fichte, J. G. (2012). Die Anweisung zum seligen Leben. Hrsg. v. Hansjürgen Verweyen. Ham¬burg: Meiner.
Ivashchenko, І. (2012). The broken mirror. J. G. Fichte’s “The science of knowledge of 1804-2” as an attempt of non-reflexive theory of self-consciousness and its influence on Heidelberg School. Sententiae, (1(XXVІ), 28–68.
Janke, W. (1970). Fichte. Sein und Reflexion – Grundlagen der kritischen Vernunft. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kant’s gesammelte Schriften (1900ff.) Hrsg. von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Bde. I–XVI). Berlin: Reimer.
Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hrsg. v. Jens Timmermann. Hamburg: Meiner.
Kant, I. (1999). Was ist Aufklärung? Ausgewählte kleine Schriften. Hrsg. v. Horst D. Brandt. Hamburg: Meiner.
Kant, I. (2017). Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft. Hrsg. v. Bettina Stangneth. Hamburg: Meiner.
Netrebiak, O. (2022). Knowledge as image in the late philosophy of Johann Gottlieb Fichte. In: NaUKMA Research Papers in Philosophy and Religious Studies, 9–10, 89–97.
Netrebiak, O. (2024). Evolution of the concept of the Absolute in Fichte. Philosophska dumka, (1), 96–109.
Rickert, H. (1899). Fichtes Atheismusstreit und die Kantische Philosophie. Ein Sekularbetrachtung. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
Zöller, G. (1998). Fichte’s Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Zöller, G. (2016). Fichte’s Later Presentation of Wissenschaftslehre. In: The Cambridge Companion to Fichte. Ed. by David James and Günter Zöller. New York: Cambridge UP. pp. 139–167
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 173
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.