Philosophical dimensions of cultural policy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-2-6

Keywords:

Ukrainian society, human being, cultural policy, social practices, pragmatism, education, popular culture

Abstract

Against the background of Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine, the question of an effective cultural policy that would support national identity, contribute to the purification of consciousness from propaganda myths and preserve the heritage of Ukrainian culture is becoming more acute. Since cultural policy is related to both aesthetic-artistic and cultural-anthropological dimensions of social life, in order to identify the effective influence of cultural policy on dominant social practices, it is necessary to find out the universal principles of its functioning. The purpose of this article is to identify the relevant philosophical and methodological basis of cultural policy for modern Ukrainian realities. Based on the fundamental ideas of Richard Rorty’s pragmatic philosophy and his analysis of cultural policies, the generally accepted nature of the inferential approach to social reality on the part of individual social groups was ascertained. The variability of cultural policy depending on the type of social organization community/society is demonstrated. In small social groups of the authoritarian type, social epistemological authority is mediated by the individual preferences of the leader of this group, so the tools of cultural policy are weak (patriarchal family, religious or political sect). An authoritarian or totalitarian mass society shows a high propensity for linguistic practices of propaganda, which can be seen as an extreme distorted form of cultural politics. In democratic societies, cultural policy is able to harmonize social life, improving its practices and building a value-symbolic world that constitutes culture in a broad sense. The social institute of education has all the tools, including digital ones, to shape the necessary social practices and educate a critical thinker who is able to generate conceptual knowledge, i.e. see relationships and be aware. Openness in decision-making, interaction of expert groups, public discussions are necessary elements for an effective cultural policy, which should be different from “cultural management”. Creative cultural industries play an important role in modern popular culture societies, and these industries significantly strengthen the economic component of social life. Public projects and initiatives effectively help to preserve Ukrainian culture, influence the level of awareness of Ukrainians and the economic well-being of our country.

Author Biography

Alla Guzhva, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Director of the Library, American University Kyiv, senior lecturer at Professor J. B. Shad Department of Theoretical and Practical Philosophy

References

Bell, D., & Oakley, K. (2015). Cultural Policy. London: Routledge, 185 p.

Bereznytska, L. I. (2023). Cultural policy. [In Ukrainian]. https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Культурна_політика

Boichenko, M. (2020). Russification as the destruction of Ukrainian national memory: prerequisites and consequences of the totalitarian Soviet policy towards Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. T. Yeschenko (ed.). Totalitarianism as a system of destruction of national memory: collection. of science works. Lviv, 58-60.

Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press, 230 p.

Dyachenko, N. (2015). State cultural policy in Ukraine and its impact on regional development: a review of approaches and methods. [In Ukrainian]. V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Bulletin ‘History of Ukraine. Ukrainian Studies: Historical and Philosophical Sciences, (20), 88-91.

Нerchanivska P. (2023). Strategic Issues of Cultural Policy in Post-War Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald: Science journal, (2), 3–8. https://doi.org/ 10.32461/2226-3209.2.2023.286867

Hugo, V. (2009). Histoire d’un crime. Déposition d’un témoin [1877-1878], préface de J.-C. Caron, postface de S. Aprile, Angoulême, Éd. Abeille et Castor. La Fabrique éditions.

Miller, T., & Yudice, G. (2002). Cultural Policy. London: Sage.

Lyuty, T. V. (2020). Mass culture and political ideologies. [In Ukrainian]. Culture and politics: ambiguity of (inter)connections: methodical materials for the course. (p. 29-36). Kyiv: Pulsary.

Maksimovska, N. O. (2023). Management of culture in the context of modern cultural policy. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian culture: past, present, ways of development (direction: cultural studies), (45), 163-169.

Plessner, H. (1924). Grenzen der Gemeinschaft. Eine Kritik des sozialen Radikalismus. Bonn: Verlag Friedrich Cohen.

Rorty, R. (2004). Cultural politics and the questions of the existence of God. In N. K. Frankenberry (ed.). Radical Interpretation in Religion. Cambridge, 53-77.

Shevchenko, M. I. (2019). Cultural policy of Ukraine under conditions of European integration: dilemmas and challenges. [In Ukrainian]. International Relations: Theory and Practical Aspects, (3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-745x.3.2019.159124

Shirochenko, Z. V. (2007). The cultural policy of the state is the formative principle of its national identity. [In Ukrainian]. Bulletin of NTUU “KPI”. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2(20), 102-105.

Skyba, M. (2007). Cultural policy of the cultured political community. [In Ukrainian]. Krytyka, XI(3), 8-11.

Toennies, F. (2005). Community and society. Basic concepts of pure sociology / trans. from German by N. Komarova, O. Pohorily. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Ukrainian Book Institute. (2023). Official site. [In Ukrainian]. https://ubi.org.ua/uk

UNESCO. (2013). Creative Economy Report 2013 Special edition. https://en.unesco.org/creativity/publication/creative-economy-report-2013

Zborovska, X. (2023). Deconstruction of the myth of the “russian world” doctrine about Orthodoxy as the basis of Russian identity. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-13

Zdioruk, S. I., Lytvynenko, O. M., & Rozumna, O. P. (2012). Cultural policy of Ukraine: national model in the European context: analyst. add. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: NISS.

Downloads

Abstract views: 153

Published

2024-02-26

How to Cite

Guzhva, A. (2024). Philosophical dimensions of cultural policy. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(2), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-2-6

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.