Ukrainian Present in the mirror of the Past – a problem of multi-layeredness




collective memory, cultural cleavage, lessons of history, heritage of imperial culture, empire, semi-colony, politics of historical memory


The article is devoted to actualization of the problem of multilayered nature of Ukrainian history in the situation of wide-scale Russian-Ukrainian war. Ukrai­nian heritage includes the layers of few empires, namely two of them (Russian empire and USSR) create associations with the state, attacking Ukraine now. Under the influence of history, modern Ukrainian society is often characterized by cultural fragmentation and existence in the regime of a cultural frontier: next to the actual Ukrainian culture and history, there is a legacy of imperial culture, and imperial history has become an integral part of the history of Ukraine itself. The multi-layered nature of Ukraine’s history is reflected in the complex political landscape of Ukrainian society and shapes it in many respects. Discussions about the interpretation of the history of Ukraine are conducted not only by historians, but also by politicians. This significantly affects the study of historical memory in Ukraine, but also gradually changes the collective memory of Ukrainians. The policy of historical memory is largely influenced by the historical policy of the state and other political forces. The main lesson for Ukraine is the need for a clear definition not only of the evaluation of certain periods of the history of Ukraine, but also of the methodology of providing historical evaluations. In addition, it is necessary to take as a basis the special laws of Ukraine devoted to specific issues of the policy of historical memory. The former semi-colonial status of Ukraine as part of Tsarist Russia and the USSR actualizes the problem of overcoming the remnants of the influence of this colonial past. Therefore, working with historical memory in Ukraine requires an obligatory appeal to post-colonial studies. The strategy of memorizing of the empire past ought to include the instruments of working through the memory of these periods: it is necessary to provide a proper assessment and to distance oneself from such a past. Author observes the dynam­ics of working with the imperial past in recent decades.

Author Biography

Oksana Dovgopolova, Odessa I. I. Mechnikov National University

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, professor, professor of the Department of Dhilosophy


Andruhovych S. (2020). Amadoka. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Stary Lev Publishing House.

Andruhovych, Y. (2001). Central Eastern revision. [In Ukrainian]. Stasyuk A., & An¬druhovych Y. My Europe. Two essays on the oldest part of the world. Lviv: Klasyka: 69–127.

Assman, A. (2016). Forgetting history is an obsession with history. [In Russian]. Moscow: UFO.

Basu, P. (2013). Memoryscapes and Multi-Sited Methods: Researching Cultural Memory in Sierra Leone. Research Methods for Memory Studies, ed. by Emily Keightley and Michael Pickering. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press: 115—131.

DE NE DE – Home. (2022). DE NE DE. Facebook community. denedenede/

Hrytsak, Y. (2006). A prophet in his homeland. Franko and his community. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Kritika.

Hrytsak, Y. (2002). Twenty-two Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Critique 4(54): 3-6.

Literary and Memorial Museum of M. Bulgakov. (2022). Bulgakov Museum. Official site. [In Ukrainian].

Narvselius, E. (2015). The aroma of memory with a taste of nostalgia: thematic restaurants in the borderlands of Central and Eastern Europe. [In Ukrainian]. Modern Ukraine:

Nora, P. (1998). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire Representations 26: 7–24.

Ryabchuk, M. (2003). Two Ukraines: real borders, virtual wars. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Kritika.

Stasiuk, A. (2001). Ship’s diary. [In Ukrainian]. Stasyuk A., Andruhovych Y. My Europe. Two essays on the oldest part of the world. Lviv: Klasyka: 5–67.

Robertson, R. (2008). Glocalization: space-time and homogeneity-heterogeneity / trans¬lated from English by T. Cymbal. Featherstone, M., Lesh, S., Robertson, R. (Eds.) (2008). Global modernities. Kyiv: Nika Center, 48-72.

“Territory of Terror”. Memorial Museum of Totalitarian Regimes. (2022). Territory of ter¬ror. Official site. [In Ukrainian].

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2015a). Law of Ukraine “On access to archives of repressive bodies of the communist totalitarian regime of 1917-1991”. [In Ukrainian]. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (26), Art. 218. laws/show/316-19#Text

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2015b). Law of Ukraine “On Condemnation of Communist and National Socialist (Nazi) Totalitarian Regimes and Prohibition of Propaganda of Their Symbols.” [In Ukrainian]. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (26), Art. 219.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2015c). Law of Ukraine “On the legal status and com¬memoration of the fighters for the independence of Ukraine in the 20th century”. [In Ukrainian]. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (25), Art. 190.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2015d). Law of Ukraine “On the Perpetuation of the Victory over Nazism in the Second World War 1939-1945”. [In Ukrainian]. The Official Bulle¬tin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (25), Art. 191. show/315-19#Text

Yaremchuk, O. (2018). Our others. The history of Ukrainian diversity. [In Ukrainian]. Lviv: Choven.

Zabuzhko, O. (2001). Chronicles of Fortinbras. Selected essays of the 90s. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Fact.

Zinchenko, O. (2016). Polish deer, Obama, and the collective memory of Ukrainians. [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: Human Rights Publishing House.


Abstract views: 39



How to Cite

Dovgopolova, O. (2022). Ukrainian Present in the mirror of the Past – a problem of multi-layeredness. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 28(1), 41–52.






Download data is not yet available.