The Natural Medium as Carrier of Meanings and Their Decoding by Living Beings: Biosemiotics in Action

Keywords: autopoiesis, biosemiotics, cognition, complex adaptive systems, enactivism, evolutionary epistemology, life, meaning, natural medium, network science, sign, Umwelt


The synthetic, integrative significance of biosemiotics as a modern interdisciplinary research program is under discussion in the article. Aimed at studying the cognitive and life activity of living beings, which are capable of recognizing signals and extracting the meanings, biosemiotics serves as a conceptual node that combines some important notions of theoretical biology, evolutionary epistemology, cognitive science, phenomenology, neuroscience and neurophilosophy as well as the theory of complex adaptive systems and network science. Worlds of perception and actions of living beings are built in the process of co-evolution, in structural coupling and in enactive interaction with the surrounding natural environment (Umwelt). Thereby the biosemiotic theories developed by the founders of biosemiotics (J. von Uexküll, Th. Sebeok, G. Prodi, H. Pattie) are conceptually closed to the system-structural evolutionary approach developed in synergetics by H. Haken and S.P. Kurdyumov, the conception of autopoiesis (H. Maturana and F. Varela), second-order cybernetics (H. von Foerster), the conception of enactivism in cognitive science (F. Varela, E. Thompson, A. Noë). The key to comprehending the processes of extracting and generating meanings is that every living organism lives in the subjectively built world (Umwelt), so that its Umwelt and its internal psychic organization become parts of a single autopoietic system. According to the well-known expression of G. Bateson, information is a not indifferent difference or a difference that makes a difference. Differences become information when a cognitive agent as an interpreter, acting as part of an autopoietic system, sees signs in these differences that make meanings.

Author Biography

Helena Knyazeva, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, , Professor of the School of Philosophy; Academician of the International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences (IASCYS)


Bergson, H. (1998) Creative Evolution. Moscow: Canon-press, Kuchkovo pole [in Russian].

Brier, S. (2011) Ethology and the Sebeokian Way from Zoosemiotics to Cyber(bio)semiotics. In: Semiotics Continues to astonish: Thomas A. Sebeok and the doctrine of signs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Cannizzaro, S., Cobley, P. (2015) Biosemiotics, Politics and Th.A. Sebeok’s Move from Linguistics to Semiotics. In: Biosemiotics. Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Biosemiotics 13. Heidelberg, N.Y., Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Favareaua, D. (2010) Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Anthology and Commentary. Springer: Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London.

Favareaub, D. (2010) Introduction: An Evolutionary History of Biosemiotics. In: Essential Readings in Biosemiotics. Anthology and Commentary. Dordrecht; Heidelberg; New York; London: Springer.

Foerster, H. von (1998) Das Konstruieren einer Wirklichkeit. In: Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? Hrgb. von Paul Watzlawick. München: Piper.

Gide, A. (1951) Journal. 1889-1939. Paris: Gallimard.

Glasersfeld, E. von (1985) Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. London: Farmer Press.

Glasersfeld, E. von (2005) Thirty Years Radical Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations,1.

Knyazeva, H. (2010) Embodied Cognition Approach in Epistemology. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 1, 42-49 [in Russian].

Knyazeva, H. (2015) J. von Uexküll’s Concept of Umwelt and Its Significance for the Modern Epistemology. Questions of Philosophy, 5: 30-43 [in Russian].

Knyazeva, H. (2018) Biosemiotics: The Origins of Interdisciplinary Movement. Questions of Philosophy, 11: 86-98. DOI: [in Russian].

Kull, K. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: An Introduction. Semiotica, 134 (1/4), 1-59.

Lorenz, K. (2000) Kant’s Conception a priori in the Light of the Modern Biology. In: Evolution. Language. Cognition. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture [in Russian].

Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J. (2001) The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Moscow: Progress-Tradition [in Russian].

Neisser, U. (1976) Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco: W.H.Freeman & Co.

Neisser, U. (1981) Cognition and Reality. Meaning and Principles of Cognitive Psychology. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Riegler, A. (2005) Editorial. The Constructivist Challenge. Constructivist Foundations, 1 (1).

Schmidt, S.J. (2007) God Has Created Reality, We Create Worlds of Experience. Constructivist Foundations, 2 (2-3).

Thompson, E. (2004) Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3.

Uexküll, J. von, Kriszat, G. (1970) Streifzuge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Frankfurt: S. Fischer (First Edition 1934).

Varela, F. (1998) Der Kreative Zirkel. Skizzen zur Naturgeschichte der Rückbezüglichkeit. In: Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Wie wissen wir, was wir zu wissen glauben? München: Piper.

Varela, F. (1999) Quatre phares pour l’avenir des sciences cognitives. Théorie – Littérature – Enseignement, 17.

Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press (7th printing 1999).

Vollmer, G. (1993) On Different Sides of the Mesocosm. Human Being, 2 [in Russian].

Vygotsky, L.S., Luria, A.R. (1993) Studies on the History of Behavior: Monkey. Primitive. Child. Moscow: Pedagogy-Press [in Russian].

How to Cite
Knyazeva, H. (2018). The Natural Medium as Carrier of Meanings and Their Decoding by Living Beings: Biosemiotics in Action. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 23(2), 192-218.