Raising the Perfect Person in the Totalitarian Practices of the Third Reich: Worldview and Philosophical Prerequisites and Modern Transhumanist Interpretations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-8

Keywords:

eugenics, racial hygiene, instrumental rationality, modernity, social Darwinism, perfect human, enhancement, transhumanism

Abstract

The relevance of the study lies in the fact that the study and thorough analysis of totalitarian practices of eugenics and racial hygiene provides a key to understanding contemporary transhumanist philosophy and practices of bodily and spiritual improvement of the human being. It is noted that modern theories of “human enhancement” cannot be adequately understood outside their historical and philosophical genealogy. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to investigate the worldview and philosophical origins of totalitarian practices of forming and educating the “perfect” human. Methods. Historical-philosophical and genealogical methods were used to reconstruct the origins of eugenic and racial-hygienic thinking. A comparative-historical approach made it possible to compare classical eugenic concepts with their radicalized forms in a totalitarian context. Hermeneutic analysis was used to interpret primary sources and scientific texts. A conceptual-analytical method was used to clarify key concepts. Novelty. The work systematically shows for the first time that the totalitarian eugenics of the Third Reich is not only an ideological phenomenon, but also the ultimate expression of the logic of modern rationality and biopolitical thinking. The conceptual connection between Nazi practices of “human enhancement” and modern transhumanist projects is substantiated through the idea of guided evolution, which allows us to identify the common risks of reducing humans to an object of technological construction. Conclusion. As a result, the research found that the ideological foundation of the totalitarian practices of the Third Reich was instrumental rationality of the modern era and a vulgar, presumptuous social Darwinism. It was determined that the theorists of Nazism inherited the leading idea of the Enlightenment era concerning rational planning and control of human life while combining it with pseudo-scientific racism.

Author Biography

Yurii Parkhomenko, State University of Trade and Economics (Kyiv-city, Ukraine)

PhD student

References

Bauman, Z. (2022). Modernity and the Holocaust. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.

Kravchenko, A., & Morozov, A. (2021). Instrumental rationality: Nihilistic and totalitarian potential. [In Ukrainian]. Educational Discourse, 31(2–3), 3–12.

Morozov, A. (2022). Totalitarianism and Western culture. [In Ukrainian]. In M. Brovko (Ed.), Culture in the context of practical forms of human existence: Monograph (pp. 261–287). Nizhyn: Publisher PE Lysenko M. M.

Baudrillard, J. (1993). The Transparency of Evil: Essays in Extreme Phenomena. (Baddeley J. St. John, transl.). New York, NY Verso.

Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25.

Conroy, M. (2007). Nazi eugenics: Precursors, policy, aftermath. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ekici, D. (2016). Skin, clothing, and dwelling: Max von Pettenkofer, the science of hygiene, and breathing walls. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 75(3), 281–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2016.75.3.281

Galton, F. (2004). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. (G. Tredoux, ed.). Kessinger Publishing. https://galton.org/books/human-faculty/text/galton-1883-human-faculty-v4.pdf

Galton, F. (1904). Eugenics: Its definition, scope and aims. The American Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 1-25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2762125

Galton, F. (1970). Memories of my life. AMS Press. https://galton.org/books/memories/galton-memories-1up-v2-300dpi.pdf

Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature (W. Rehg, M. Pensky, & H. Beister, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Haeckel, E. (1896). The History of Creation: Or, The Development of the Earth and Its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes. (E. R. Lankester, Trans.). Vols. I–II, Henry S. King. Project Gutenberg. www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/40472

Haeckel, E. (1904/2018). The wonders of life: A popular study of biological philosophy (J. McCabe, Trans.). New York: Harper & brothers.

Haeckel, E. (1897). The evolution of man. New York: D. Appleton.

Mosse, G. L. (2003). Nazi culture: Intellectual, cultural and social life in the Third Reich. (S. Attanasio and others, Trans.). Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press.

Ploetz, A. (1895/2012). The excellence of our race and the protection of the weak. Berlin: Scholar’s Choice.

Proctor, R. N. (1988). Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://scispace.com/pdf/racial-hygiene-medicine-under-the-nazis-3xt4jr6u6u.pdf

Spencer, H. (1864/2009). The principles of biology (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1864-7_Spencer_Biology_CUL-DAR.LIB.599.pdf

Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in the post-human era. Vision-21 Symposium. https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/100-FYS-F15/Readings/Vinge,%20The%20Coming%20Technological%20Singularity.pdf

Abstract views: 3

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Parkhomenko, Y. (2026). Raising the Perfect Person in the Totalitarian Practices of the Third Reich: Worldview and Philosophical Prerequisites and Modern Transhumanist Interpretations. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2026-32-1-8

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.