The impact of strategic rationality and limited autonomy on the decline of the university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-4Keywords:
university, education, strategic rationality, half-education, Theodor Adorno, Jürgen HabermasAbstract
In recent decades, we have been observing a prolonged process of the decline of the university – not merely as an educational institution, but, more importantly, as a fundamental social institution. The university has traditionally functioned as a critical locus of influence in the formation of public opinion and, as such, is indispensable to the proper functioning of the state. As a social institution, it is imperative that the university maintain the primacy of communicative rationality; for it is the ascendancy of strategic rationality that undermines the very idea of the university and ultimately precipitates its deterioration–a phenomenon clearly observable today. In this sense, the university has also become a casualty of the expansion of instrumental rationality, which, as Jürgen Habermas has argued, engenders various forms of social pathology. The idea of the university – as developed by famous influential philosophers, including Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm von Humboldt, and John H. Newman – was based in the principle of full institutional autonomy. Such autonomy was intended to guarantee an open and unrestricted discourse within the university, a discourse that could subsequently exert meaningful influence on the socio-political life of the state. Today, however, the modern university is being divested of precisely this autonomy. It finds itself either subordinated to the state, which imposes its own regulatory frameworks, or subject to the dictates of the market. In either case, communicative rationality is supplanted by strategic rationality, rendering genuine free discourse impossible. Universities are increasingly reduced to state-run or commercial entities, while knowledge is commodified. The result, as Theodor Adorno foresaw, is the proliferation of half-education. For this reason, it is essential to undertake a thorough examination of the modern crisis of the university and to outline potential pathways toward its resolution.
References
Adorno, T. (2017). The Theory of Semi-Education. (M. Kultaieva, trans). [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 20(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606- 2017-20-1-128-152
Boichenko, M. (2020). The Natural Right to Higher Education, or What Changes Does a Modern University Need, and What Should Never Change? [In Ukrainian]. In D. Shevchuk (ed.), Quo vadis, University? (pp. 69–84). Ostroh: Publishing House of the National University “Ostroh Academy”.
Boychenko, M. I. (2017). Between “Half-Education” and “Half-Action”: In Search of the Path to Effective Education. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 21(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-21-2-219-239
Bystrytskyi, E., Zymovets, R., & Proleyev, S. (2020). Communication and Culture in the Global World. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter. [In Ukrainian].
Eagleton, T. (2010, December 17). The death of universities. The Guardian. https://www. theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/dec/17/death-universities-malaise-tuition-fees
Eagleton, T. (2015, April 6). The slow death of the university. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-slow-death-of-the-university/
Habermas, J. (2002). The Idea of the University – Educational Processes (L. Nor, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. In M. Zubrytska, N. Babalyk, & Z. Rybchynska (eds.), The Idea of the University: An Anthology (pp. 185–211). Lviv: Litopys.
Honcharenko, K. S. (2020). When the Humanitarian Cried or the Crisis of Humanitarian Education in Ukraine: Symptoms and Treatment Options. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 26(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-9
Kant, I. (1979). The conflict of the faculties (M. J. Gregor, Trans. & Intro.). New York: Abaris Books.
Kultaeva, M. (2017). Education and its Deformations in Modern Culture: On the Relevance of T. Adorno’s Theory of Half-Education in Modern Socio-Cultural Contexts. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 20(1), 153–195. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309- 1606-2017-20-1-153-195
Nichols, T. (2019). Let Me Google That for You: How Unlimited Information Is Making Us Dumber. (E. Kuznetsova, trans.). Kyiv: Nash Format. [In Ukrainian].
Newman, J. G. (2002). The Idea of the University. (R. Dubasevych, trans.). [In Ukrainian]. In M. Zubrytska, N. Babalyk, & Z. Rybchynska (eds.), The Idea of the University: An Anthology (pp. 35–65). Lviv: Litopys.
Proleiev, S. V. (2020). Chances of education in the global world. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 25(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2019-25-2-2
Skirbekk, G. (2019). Epistemic challenges in a modern world. From “fake news” and “post truth” to underlying epistemic challenges in science-based risk-societies. Zürich: LIT Verlag.
Vorona, V. M., & Shulha, M. O. (Eds.). (2021). Ukrainian Society: Monitoring Social Changes. 30 Years of Independence (Issue 8(22)). Institute of Sociology of the NAS of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian].
Yermolenko, A. (2021). Discourse. Communication. Morality (monograph). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka. [In Ukrainian].
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
