Delegitimization of “Russian world”: alternatives to nonalternativeness




delegitimization, legitimization, social norms, “russian world”, russia, Ukraine, war


The defeat of russia on the battlefield must be accompanied by the delegitimization of the “russian world”, that is, the loss of attractiveness for the russians themselves of the concept of the supremacy of everything Russian over everything non-russian. Cultivating russia’s greatness as a key task of “russian world” is one of the main reasons for the current Russian armed aggression against Ukraine, but also for Russia’s aggressive foreign policy in the world in general. The purpose of this article is to clarify the main features of the delegitimization of the “russian world” in the regime of social education. To do this, the definition of “russian world” as a special symbolic system, which the modern russian political regime is trying to adjust from the standpoint of aggressive russian geopolitical subjectivity, has been previously clarified. This leads to the performative selfdenial of the “russian world”, which can be traced at the level of the accumulation of symbolic capital, the establishment of political elites (the authorities and the opposition), as well as at the level of the development of civil society. Social learning involves the search at the level of civil society for new forms of communicative self-organization at various levels of collective formation. A way out for such performative self-denial is possible only through the ways of social learning, the search for a change in one’s own identity, and not through attempts at autistic self-affirmation characteristic of the modern russian political regime, as well as the destruction of all political and cultural alternatives to the stateapproved canon. Social education is a way of soft and non-violent delegitimization of the “russian world”, in contrast to rebellion and revolutions, which in russia traditionally only lead to the emergence of even more brutal forms of state dictatorship. The monologic nature of the russian political space provokes the reation of new forms of social consensus outside the russian political system – in the sphere of culture, counterculture, and subcultures.

Author Biography

Natalia Fialko, National University of Physical Education and Sport of Ukraine

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department of Social Sciences and Humanities


Arendt, H. (1970). Macht und Gewalt, München, Piper.

Badalian, D. (2018). “Official Narodnost’” or Narodnost’? S.S. Uvarov and A.S Khomyakov. [In Russian]. Notebooks on Conservatism, 1, 51-66.

Boichenko, M. (2018). Legitimation and delegitimization: value bases of social norms. [In Ukrainian]. Tararoiev Y. V. and others. (ed.). Philosophy in the Modern World: Materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference, November 16-17, 2018. Kharkiv: Tochka, 118-120.

Boichenko, M. (2020). Russification as the destruction of Ukrainian national memory: prerequisites and consequences of the totalitarian Soviet policy towards Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Totalitarianism as a system of destruction of national memory: a collection of scientific works based on the materials of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference with international participation on June 11-12, 2020 / scientific editor T. Yeshchenko. Lviv: Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University Printing House, 58-60.

Boychenko, I. V. (2000). Philosophy of History. Textbook. Kyiv: Znannya.

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field. Trans. by Loic J. D. Wacquant, & S. Farage. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1-18.

Bugajski, О. (2022). Failed State: A Guide to Russia’s Rupture. Trans. from English by M. Dubrova, S. Bandera, G. Rak, A. Melnychenko, & O. Okhrimenko. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Ark.UA.

Buketov, K. (2023). What is “PMC Ryodan” and where did it come from in Russia. [In Russian]. Deutsche Welle. 03/06/2023.

Diogenes, Laertius. (1925). Lives of Eminent Philosophers, V. I: Books 1-5. Trans. by R. D. Hicks. Loeb Classical Library 184. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 592 p.

Eder, K. (1985). Geschichte als Lernprozess? Zur Pathogenese politischer Modernität in Deutschland. Fankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Felshtynsky, Y., & Popov, V. (2022). From the Red Terror to the Mafia State. Russia’s State Security in the Struggle for World Domination (1917-2036) / trans. from Russian by S. Gromenko. [In Ukrainian]. 2nd ed. Kyiv: Nash Format.

Habermas, J. (1983). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: MIT Press. 244 p.

Habermas, J. (2014). Towards a reconstruction of historical materialism / trans. from German by V. Kuplin. [In Ukrainian]. Kiev: Dukh i Litera.

Menyailo, D. V., Ivanova, Y. A., & Menyailo, L. N. (2019). AUE – criminal youth movement: essence and methods of distribution. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, (3): 107-111.

Struve, P. B. (1991). Intelligentsia and revolution. [In Russian]. A. V. Danilova (ed.). Milestones: Collection of articles about the Russian intelligentsia. (pp. 148–165). Sverdlovsk: Ural University Publishing House.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2023). Pitirim Alexandrovitch Sorokin. American sociologist. Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Thomassen, L. (2019). Performative self-contradiction. E. Allen, & E, Mendieta (eds.). The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon. (pp. 291–292). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tolstoy, A. V. (ed.) (1995). “They took Russia with them...” Russian emigrant artists in France, 1920s – 1970s: exhibition catalog from the collection of René Guerra. Moscow: Avangard.

Vakulenko, T. (retelling). (2022). Adventures of Baron Munchausen: a fairy tale. story: full version: retelling for children according to the orig. texts by H. Bürger, R. Raspe, E. Kestner. Kharkiv: School.

Volkovskyi, V. (2020). Methodological issues of “russian world” doctrine study from the philosophical perspective. [In Ukrainian]. Мultiversum. Philosophical almanac, 2(172), 15-31.

Zborovska, K. (2022). Analysis and deconstruction of the main ideologues of the “Russian World” doctrine. [In Ukrainian]. Studia Orientalne, R. 11, nr 4 (24), 95-114.

Zborovska, X. (2022). Deconstruction of the myth of the “russian world” doctrine about Orthodoxy as the basis of Russian identity. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 230–239.


Abstract views: 72



How to Cite

Fialko, N. (2024). Delegitimization of “Russian world”: alternatives to nonalternativeness. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(2), 78–91.






Download data is not yet available.