Controversies in the Ukrainian field of philosophy of educatio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-9Keywords:
controversy, philosophy of education, Ukrainian philosophy of education, discourse, paradigm, representation, interaction, education for peace, relations, institutional system, education reform, toxic spaceAbstract
In order to establish and outline the current state of Ukrainian philosophy of education as a scientific philosophical direction and at the same time a social institutional system that has emerged in Ukraine during the last three decades, a “controversial” approach is used, a method of studying controversies or disputed points, contradictions and tensions between representations and discourses regarding education A working definition of controversy is formulated as an intermediate category that contributes to overcoming gaps between the object of research and the research position in a situation of contradiction and tension between representations and discourses around a certain object, which is expressed in open or hidden debates, disputes, etc. and which characterized by zones of uncertainty regarding the “trajectory“ of this object. An attempt is made to catalog the controversies of the philosophy of education. The controversies of the hypostases of the philosophy of education, reforms of Ukrainian education are considered; interaction between education and philosophy of education in the system of “dirty systems”; toxic spaces in education and the action of the Lucifer effect (F. Zimbardo) in them as the metamorphosis of good into evil. The precedent of the loss of reputation by a group of scientists representing the field of philosophy of education is discussed. The progress of the Ukrainian philosophy of education is noted and its tasks are outlined in the research of social relations in education, the sphere of relations between subjects of education, toxic spaces in education. The “controversial” approach provides an opportunity to bring the philosophy of education closer to the subjects of education, involving them in the study of tensions between discourses and representations that they create and formulate.
References
Alekseeva, K. I. (2021). Discourse (philosophy). [In Ukrainian]. Great Ukrainian encyclopedia. https://vue.gov.ua/Discourse (philosophy)
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2020). The phenomenon of education: in 5 books. [In Ukrainian]. Sumy: University book.
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2012). Philosophy of education: search for priorities: in 7 books. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Lesya.
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2017). Value discourse in education: in 7 books. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Lesya.
Andrushchenko, V. & Predborska, I. (eds.). (2009) Philosophy of education: a textbook (with the stamp of the Ministry of Education and Culture of Ukraine). [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Publishing House.
Arbyenina, V. L., & Sokuryanska, L. G. (eds.). (2012). Ukrainian studentship in search of identity (2012): monograph. [In Ukrainian]. Kharkiv: V.N. Karazin KhNU.
Boichenko, M. (2022). Correcting the names of things: the coercion of war in education and social life. Philosophy of Education 28(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309- 1606-2022-28-1-1
Boychenko, M. I. (2017). Between “half-education” and “half-action”: in search of a path to effective education. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 21(2), 219-239. https:// doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-21-2-219-239
Boychenko, N. M. (2016). Counterfactuality of the goals of university education. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 18(1), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606- 2016-18-1-136-149
Bredemeier, C. (2016). The fight for delegates at party congresses is the central theme of the elections. [In Russian]. Voice of America. 04/13/2016. https://www.golosameriki. com/a/us-presidential-politics/3282985.html
Burlaka, O. (2023) What was my post about the uselessness of world literature at school about? [In Ukrainian]. Facebook. 04/23/2023. https://www.facebook.com/profile. php?id=100004985679355
Burlakova, V. (2014). Is it possible otherwise? [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian week. 23.08.2014. https://tyzhden.ua/khiba-mozhna-inakshe/
Buryachok, A. A., Dotsenko P. P. (eds.). (1973). Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 vols. Vol. 4. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
Cherepanova, S. (2022). Contradictions of the philosophy of education as an object of scientific analysis. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of education 28(2), 148–158. https://doi. org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-8.
Dichek, N. (ed.). (2022). Paradigms of development and trends of school education reform in Ukraine at the time of independence: monograph. [Electronic edition] (2022) / team of authors: Dychek N. P., Saukh P. Yu., Yevtukh M. B., Boychenko M. I., Antonets N. B., Zagorodnya A. A., Shevchenko S M. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Pedagogical thought.
Editors of the American Heritage Dictionaries. (2016). 100 Words every high school graduate should know. Collins Reference.
Ferguson, R. (2019). Innovating pedagogy. OpenUniv. https://www.learntechlib. org/p/207292/.
FORCCAST. (2016). Qu’est-ce qu’une controverse? FORCCAST. Un projet porté par SciencePo. https://controverses.org/fr/controversies/
Gorbunova, L. (2011). Transhumanitarianism as a factor in the development of modern science and education. Materials of the methodological seminar. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 10(1-2), 98-141.
Hayden, M. J. (2012). What Do Philosophers of Education Do? An Empirical Study of Philosophy of Education Journals. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9262-7
Homerton College. (2023). Professor David Bridges. Emeritus Fellow. University of Cambridge. https://www.homerton.cam.ac.uk/people/david-bridges
ISIH. (2023). The society for the history of human thought. International Society For Intellectual History. https://is-ih.com/
Klepko, S. F. (2001). Ukrainian field of philosophy of education. [In Ukrainian].Practical Philosophy 1(2), 197-211.
Klepko, S. F. (2003). Education that encourages inquiry, or the secret of the paradox of “innovation societies” - “miseducation”. [In Ukrainian]. Bulletin of school exchange programs 16, 11.
Klepko, S. F. (2006). Civil society – a ghost, a shadow or a caloric? [In Ukrainian]. Steps to civil society. Post-Maidan civil society of Ukraine: lessons for the country and the world: scientific almanac. (pp. 158–161). Kyiv: Ukrainian World Coordination Council.
Klepko, S. F. (2009). Curriculum as the architecture of education: institutional, strategic and tactical aspects. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 8(1–2), 258–273.
Klepko, S. F. (2011). Educological representations of knowledge: paradigms of education. [In Ukrainian]. Postmethodology 102(5), 2–9.
Klepko, S. F. (2016). Humanitarian systems are, first of all, “dirty systems.” [In Russian]. Studies of humanitarian systems. issue 4. Axiomatic theory of formation: perspectives of construction / ed. and comp. by A. A. Ostapenko. (p. 119–145). Moscow: Research Institute of School Technologies.
Klepko, S. F. (2019). Interaction between education and philosophy of education: from proto-cooperation to mutualism. [In Ukrainian]. Scientific Bulletin of H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Philosophy Series 52(1), 3-18.
Klepko, S.F., & Golovko, M.V. (2021). Curriculum. [In Ukrainian]. Encyclopedia of education. Second edition / Scientific editor. coll.: V. G. Kremen (head) [etc.]; NAPN of Ukraine. (p. 508-509). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Knysh, I. (2013). Formation of modern educational discourse: holistic, totalitarian and synergistic approach. [In Ukrainian]. Worldview - Philosophy - Religion 4, 259-269.
Kobyshcha, V. (2017). ANT and digital reality: heterogeneity and controversies. interview with sociologist Mykola Rudenko. [In Ukrainian]. FOM LABS. Laboratory of social researchers. April 14, 2017. https://fomlabs.ru/material/ANT-i-cifrovaja-realnost-geterogennost-i-kontoverzy
Kodelya, Z. (2017). Some thoughts on the philosophy of education. [In Russian]. Philosophy of Education 21(2), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2017-21-2-46-56
Kremen, V.G. and others. (ed.). (2019). Education for peace = Edukacja dla pokoju: coll. of science pr.: in 2 vols. T.1. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: «Yurka Lyubchenko» LLC.
Marion, M.-P., & Peliz, A. C. (2013). Controverse, polémique, expertise: trois notions pour aborder le débat sur le changement climatique en France. VertigO 13(2). https://doi. org/10.4000/vertigo.14297
Merriam-Webster. (n. d.). Miseducation. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam- Webster.. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/miseducation
Latour, B. (2014) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Trans. with English I. Polonskoi. [In Russian]. Moscow: Izd. House of the Higher School of Economics.
Lutai V. S. About the state of development of the conceptual foundations of the philosophy of education in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 1(1), 30-37.
Odum, Yu. (1986) Ecology: In 2 vols. Trans. from English. T. 2. [In Russian]. Moscow: Mir.
Pinchuk, O. P. and Luparenko, L. A. (2023). Web-oriented encyclopedic edition as a tool for dissemination of verified knowledge in the field of education. Educational Technology Quarterly [Online], (2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.582
Piponnier, A. (2022). De quoi la controverse est-elle le nom: Usages et circulation de la notion dans un corpus d’articles de recherches en communication organisationnelle. Communication & Organisation, 62, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.4000/ communicationorganisation.11481
Popovych, M. V. (1998). Essay on the history of culture of Ukraine. Kyiv: ArtEk.
Ryzhko, V. (2006). About the philosophy of education: how it is possible. Philosophy of Education 4(2), 15-23.
Sauch, P. Y. (2020). “Hypostasis” of the philosophy of education... Is everything really that simple? Knowledge. Education. Education. Collection of materials V International. science and practice conf. (p. 124-128). Vinnytsia: VNTU.
Seurat, C., & Tari, T. (eds). (2021). Controverses mode d’emploi. Préface de Bruno Latour. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Sidorkin, A. M. (2023). Pedagogy of relation : education after reform. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003179627
Siegel, H. (2023). Philosophy of education. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www. britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-education.
Smeyers, P. (2018). International handbook of philosophy of education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5
Smith, M. K. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu on education: Habitus, capital, and field. Reproduction in the practice of education. The encyclopaedia of pedagogy and informal education. https://infed.org/mobi/pierre-bourdieu-habitus-capital-and-field-exploring-reproduction-in-the-practice-of-education/
Spatscheck, C. (2010). .Theodor W. Adorno on Education. The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. www.infed.org/thinkers/adorno_on_education.htm
SciencesPo. (2023). The médialab. About. SciencesPo Medialab. https://medialab. sciencespo.fr/en/about/
Topuzov, O.M. et al. (ed.). (2021). History and philosophy of education in independent Ukraine: controversies of modern scientific knowledge: coll. theses of the All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference with international participation. June 8, 2021, Kyiv, Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [Electronic scientific publication]. [In Ukrainian]. Kyiv: Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
VUE. (2023). Philosophy of education. [In Ukrainian]. Great Ukrainian Encyclopedia. https://vue.gov.ua/Filosofiya_osvity.
Zimbardo, F. (2013). The Lucifer effect: understanding how good people turn evil (Unabridged). Trans. with English Moscow: Alpina non-fiction.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 217
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
