Information technologies in the education of contemporary China: reality and opportunities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-5

Keywords:

education, high technology, ‘smart classroom’, ‘flipped classroom’, basic needs for information technology, integration of information technology in education, adaptation to the information environment

Abstract

With the rapid development of modern information technologies, their integration into all areas of education is accelerating, which contributes to the penetration of innovations into the education space. The author emphasizes that the design of many educational technologies was focused on the goals of education and included a sufficient number of educational concepts and elements. However, if teachers blindly adhere to the traditional concept of “technology is only a tool”, then this creates a sense of superiority of their own status and a narrow understanding of the value of technology.

The author relies in his research on the latest achievements in the field of not only high technologies that are used in education, but also on psychological and social research on the impact of the latter both on education and on a person. The author proposes to perceive technologies in the context of a new culture, and shows possible ways of their more adequate use. Working with artificial technological objects is not only the acceptance of an artificial object, but also the adoption of a technical culture, which indicates a new cultural relationship between people and technology, and vice versa. On the basis of analyzing the phenomenon and essence of contemporary information technology, the author of this article tries to find out the problems existing in the application of contemporary information technology in education through a questionnaire survey, and reflects on the influence of technology on teachers and students in the education system.

The answers of the survey participants made it possible to present a picture of the use of information technologies in education as a holistic and complex process. The analysis of the results obtained, as well as everyday practical training in the skills of using high technologies, enabled the author to establish that the influence of information technologies on education is complex, this is a new stage in the development of education as a whole, which allows us to characterize the process of their use as a holistic system. The influence of technology has completely changed all structures and all participants in education. The results of the survey also made it possible to identify a number of problems that indicate shortcomings in the modern space of education, the didactic nature of learning in the sense of conveying and receiving information in new conditions (we are talking not only about digitalization as a process, but also about changes aimed at transforming teaching methodology).

Author Biography

Sun Wei, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi, (China)

Professor of the Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Educational Sciences;  Post-graduate student of the Department of Philosophy of National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (Ukraine)

References

Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring Self-regulation in Online and Blended Learning Environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). How the Flipped Classroom Is Radically Transforming Learning. The Daily Riff. http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/how-the-flipped-classroom-is-radically-transforming-learning-536.php

Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing Online and Blended Learner’s Selfregulated Learning Strategies and Academic Performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004

Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophy Inquiry. London: The University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practice and Reflection – Reflection on the Guidance of Sociology. Trans. by Li Kang. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.

Cai, S., Jiao, Y., Yang, Y., Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Practice of Multimodal Smart Classroom in 5G Environment. Modern Distance Education Research, 5. 103–112.

Chen, L, Lu, X., Zheng, Q. (2019). ‘Internet+education’ View of Knowledge. Knowledge Regression and Knowledge Evolution, 7, 10–18.

Dolska, O. (2018). Paradigmatic changes in the modern philosophy of education. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 23(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309- 1606-2018-23-2-146-163

Dolskaya, O. A., Holozubov, A. V., & Horodyskaya, O. N. (2016) Man in the modern world: on the way to a new educational paradigm: Monograph. [In Russian]. Kharkiv: NTU “KhPI”.

Easterbrook, S. (2012). What is Climate Informatics. https://www.easterbrook.ca/ steve/2012/09/what-is-climate-informatics/

Foertsch, J., Moses, G., Strikwerda, J., & Litzkow, M. (2002). Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH® Web-based Streaming Video Software. Journal of Engineering Education 91(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002. tb00703.x

Ge, X., Zhang, L. (2021). An Analysis of the Causes of the “New Digital Divide” Between Urban and Rural Teachers and the Path of Bridging It: A Theoretical Perspective of the “Knowledge Gap”. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 4, 42–51.

Glaser, William. (2011). Understand Your Students: Win-Win Between Teachers and Students under The Choice Theory (Translated by Yang Cheng). Beijing: Capital Normal University Press.

Huang, R. (2022). On the Systematic Integration of Science and Technology and Education. China Distance Education, 7, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20220507.001.

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated Learning Strategies Predict Learner Behavior and Goal Attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33.

Miao, C.-Z. (2015). Four-dimensional Review of Uncertainty in Technology Use. Journal of Northeast University (Social Science) 17(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.15936/j. cnki.1008-3758.2015.03.002.

Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30-43. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1183338

Li, M. (2008). Criticism of ‘Instrumental Rationality’ of Educational Technology. Educational Research, 5, 56–61.

Palmisano, S. J. (2008). A Smarter Planet: The Next Leadership Agenda. IBM, (6), 1–8.

Ruswiati, R. (2019). The Threshold of High Technology in Global Commerce: Leveraging the Role of Higher Education Institution. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi-Manajemen- Akuntansi 15(1), 121–128.

Schutz, A. (2010). The Meaning of the Social World. Trans. by You Zongqi. Beijing: Business Printing House.

Strayer, J. (2007). The Effects of the Classroom Flip on the Learning Environment: A Comparison of Learning Activity in A Traditional Classroom and Flip Classroom that Used An Intelligent Tutoring System. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1189523914

Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics and Self-regulated Learning Technology. Self-efficacy and Course Outcomes in Online Learning. Distance Education 34(3), 302–323.

Wang, X., Liu, G., Nong, L., Gao, N., Zheng, Q., & Guo, Y. (2021). The Cultivation Mechanism of Intelligent Classroom Empowering Students’ Wisdom: Inner Mechanism, Structural Elements and Linkage Path. Research in Electro-Chemical Education, 8, 26-34.

Wu, G. (2022). Classic Reading of Philosophy of Technology. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.

Xie, Y., & Li, J. (2020). Classroom Teaching Design Based On Deep Learning in the Age of Intelligence. Electrochemical Education Research, (5), 73–80. https://doi. org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2020.05.011.

Yang, X., Xie, Y., Gou R. & He J. Le. (2020). An Empirical Study on the Construction of a Smart Classroom Model. Chinese E-learning, 9, 50–57.

Zhu, Z. (2014). Leading the Innovative Development of Education Informatization with Smart Education. China Education Informatization-Higher Education Vocational Education, 5, 4-8.

Zhuo, Y., Xiao, W. (2019). From Instrumental Rationality to Behavioral Meaning. Reconstruction of the Relationship between Teachers and Technology, 2, 66–70.

Downloads

Abstract views: 185

Published

2023-07-21

How to Cite

Wei, S. (2023). Information technologies in the education of contemporary China: reality and opportunities. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 29(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2023-29-1-5

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.