Deconstruction of the myth of the “russian world” doctrine about Orthodoxy as the basis of Russian identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-13Keywords:
myth, ideology, “Russian world”, identity, Orthodoxy, argumentative practicesAbstract
The article analyzes the basic ideology of the “Russian Peace” doctrine: the myth that “Orthodoxy is the basis of Russian identity.” The existence of this ideologeme in the informational and symbolic field of Ukraine and the whole world, its manipulation, and its inclusion in the current context of the Ukrainian cultural space lead to a distorted perception of relations between Russia and Ukraine, the existing war between them. The article attempts to reveal those distortions and semantic substitutions that are ontologically contained in many ideologemes of the “Russian world” and which can be analyzed as typical errors in the context of the argumentation theory. Such research aims to develop a conditional “dictionary” for the mythologist of the “Russian world,” which could be used during the conduct of a thorough information confrontation. The author chose the myth “Orthodoxy is the basis of Russian identity” as the basic ideologeme because most other ideologues are derived from this thesis with the help of skillful semantic manipulations. Secondly, this myth is interpreted and used by Russian ideologues in incredibly diverse ways and in various contexts. Based on the analysis of this myth, the author concludes that the ideology of the “Russian measure” by definition does not meet the criteria of clarity, clarity, and unequivocalness; the meanings of its key concepts are as variable as possible, depend on the context, are used interchangeably in general formulations where clarification of the non-standard use of the term is not foreseen; there is a change of identities, which makes it possible to manipulate historical facts and people’s memory. Russian ideologues constantly use such logical errors in their argumentative practices. In the process of revealing the illogicality and paradox of the mentioned myth, it turns out that the very essence of this mythologem significantly contributes to the unfolding of the crisis of Russian culture and politics, which is spoken about by the same ideologues who praise the messianic role of Russia.
References
Dostoevsky, F. M. (1982). The Brothers Karamazov. Collected works in 12 vols. (V. 11, s. 5–599). Moscow: Pravda. [in Russian]
Drobizheva, L. M. (ed.). (2013). Civic, ethnic and regional identity: yesterday, today, tomorrow. Moscow: ROSSPEN. [in Russian]
Interfax. (2016). Putin confessed his sympathy for the Bible’s communist ideas. https://www.interfax.ru/russia/491445 [In Russian]
Krotov, Y. G. (2003). Special Russian spirituality? Radio Svoboda-Ukraine. Official Site. https://www.svoboda.org/a/24202254.html [in Russian]
Malakhov, V. (2022). Communion by Russia. https://www.facebook.com/ groups/186809768152216/posts/2138747096291797/ [In Russian].
Official website of the Moscow Patriarchate. (2014). Declaration of Russian identity. November 11, 2014 following the meeting of the XVIII World Russian People’s Council. http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/508347.html [in Russian]
Pobedonoscev, K. P. (1896). Moscow collection. Moscow: Synoidal Printing House. [In Russian]
Sagan, O. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian wars as an objective consequence of the process of development of the ideology of Muscovite-Russian messianism. War as a socio-cultural phenomenon: Round table of «Philosophical thought». [In Ukrainian]. Filosofska Dumka, (3), 7–58.
Segeda, A. (2016). Putin: Orthodoxy and Russia are inseparable. https://pra-voslavie.fm/ novosti/putin-pravoslavie-i-rossiya-nerazdelimi/. [In Russian]
Tkach, N. N. (2019). Orthodox tradition in the formation of Russian identity. [In Russian]. Scientific statements of the Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Right 44(2), 351–356.
Tkach, N. N., & Reznik, S. V. (2019). The identification matrix of Orthodoxy in the context of the search for models of national integration in Russian society. [In Russian]. Scientific statements of the Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Right 44(4), 617–623.
Volkovskyi, V. (2022). Lessons of war for the formation of the strategy of Ukrainian eastern policy: philosophical considerations. [In Ukrainian]. Philosophy of Education 28(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-1-4
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 251
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.