Active citizenship in a globalized world: philosophical and educational implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2021-27-2-10Keywords:
active citizenship, philosophy of education, lifelong learning, multiculturalism, democracyAbstract
In today’s globalized world, the issue of active citizenship is gaining relief, becoming an essential determinant of the nature of civilizational progress. The study examines the possibilities of modern education to develop civic activism. The underestimated potential of lifelong learning as a tool for the development of active citizens has been identified, including opportunities for the development of older citizens. We have demonstrated the potential of the neoliberal model of active citizenship as one that corresponds to the current state of civilizational development, at the heart of which is a person who is aware of his political rights and responsibilities in a multicultural world. It was shown that lifelong learning, the enduring educational trajectory of the individual, should be a practice of developing democratic values and principles of active citizenship, developing skills in working with sources of information, initiative, responsibility, knowledge of social principles, and the role of citizens in it, etc. The article carries out a historical and philosophical reconstruction of views on the issue of active citizenship. The dynamics of the content of the above concept are demonstrated. It was possible to outline methodological guidelines that allow interpreting active citizenship as an educational ideal, based on some modern methodological positions (lifelong learning, etc.). The study demonstrates the shortcomings of the methodological position, according to which the competence of active citizenship, for the most part, is the result of educational influence in the system of secondary and higher education. Possibilities of the fruitful combination of formal and non-formal education in the development of active citizenship are demonstrated. The symbiosis allows providing the necessary praxeological dimension (combination of theory and practice of active citizenship) to the processes of becoming an active citizen in the current challenges of civilization.
References
Ayzikova, L.V. (2012). The concept of lifelong learning in international documents and research. [In Ukrainian]. Scientific works of the Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy complex. Seria: Pedagogy 199 (187), 62-64.
Benn, R. (2000). The genesis of active citizenship in the learning society. Studies in the Education of Adults 32(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2000.11661433.
Birdwell, J., Scott, R., & Horley, E. (2013). Active citizenship, education and service learning. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 8(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197913483683.
Chando, T. (2021). Active citizenship in contemporary democratic practice in Africa: Challenges and prospects. South African Journal of Philosophy, 40(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2021.1885908.
Ećimović, T. (2021). The philosophy of true harmony in global citizenship. UN Chronicle. https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/philosophy-true-harmony-global-citizenship
Egamberdieva, A. M. (2021) Historical and philosophical issues of active citizenship and initiative in youth. Psychology and Education Journal 58(2), 6200-6206. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.3138.
Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory / eds. C Cronin and P. De Greif. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
Jansen, T., Chioncel, N., & Dekkers, H. (2006). Social cohesion and integration: learning active citizenship. British Journal of Sociology of Education 27(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600556305.
Karpets, L.A. (2015). Continuing education in the context of the educational reality of the information society. [In Ukrainian]. Practical Philosophy (55), 167-172.
Kennedy, K. J. (2007). Student constructions of ‘active citizenship’: what does participation mean to students? British Journal of Educational Studies 55(3), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00381.x.
Lytvynchuk, O. (2011). Social and personal identity: socio-philosophical analysis. [In Ukrainian]. Scientific notes of the National University «Ostroh Academy». Seria: Philosophy (8), 195-202.
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2009). From Active Citizenship to World Citizenship: a proposal for a world university. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 236-248. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2009.8.2.236.
Peterson, A., & Knowles, C. (2009). Active citizenship: a preliminary study into student teacher understandings. Educational Research 51(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880802704731.
Polovaya, N.O. (2015) Continuing education as a vector of information society development. [In Ukrainian]. Grani (6), 98-102.
Sudakova, V. M. (2017). Social solidarity in the globalized space of culture: the problem of analyzing the integrative potential of new practices. [In Ukrainian]. Current issues of sociology, psychology, pedagogy 1, 124-130.
Woodward, V. (2007). Active Learning for Active Citizenship: An Overview. OR Insight 20(2 Supplement), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2007.9.
Downloads
-
PDF (Українська)
Downloads: 331
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
