The dynamics of secularization as a process of mutual learning of philosophy and religion
Keywords:post-secular society, secularity, dialogue, two-way learning process, religious identity
The article deals with the current stage of development of society, associated with the formation of a new type of relationship between the secular and the religious consciousness. If in the secular society of the recent past, these relations were based on the domination of secular ideology, and religious consciousness was interpreted as the evolutionary past of society, the significance of which decreases with social progress until the complete disappearance of religion, then post-secular culture is associated with the formation of a new constructive attitude towards the religious consciousness as an immanent component of social consciousness, which does not disappear with the development of society, but only changes the forms of expression, as well as with the formation of an equal dialogue between secular and religious. Post-secularism does not mean a return to the dominant position of religion and does not cancel the achievement of the secular paradigm. Secularism has transcoding the cultural matrix, therefore, it is no longer possible to take a central meaning and value-forming place in the culture of religion and confessional traditions that once gave birth to this culture. In addition, globalization creates a situation of interaction of religious traditions, unprecedented in the history of mankind, within the framework of one cultural and legal field. We are no longer talking about oppression by more progressive traditions of spiritually primitive traditions (Christianity or Islam in relation to paganism) - traditions with highly developed spiritual, intellectual and missionary potential have to interact with each other. Post-secularity means not only a critical revision of the stage consciousness, but also openness, receptivity, and at least interest in all the various forms of human religiosity. Secularization must be understood, according to J. Habermas, as the dual and complementary learning. Modernization embraces religious and secular consciousness, modifying them. This process of learning, change and enrichment is the essence of the post-secular era. The main characteristic of post-secular society is the "two-way learning process" of faith and reason, or their correlation. In the field of education, the necessary result of the formation of a post-secular society is the introduction of dialogue and tolerance as necessary principles of educational activity and the absence of discrimination on religious grounds.
Grotius H. (1994). On the law of peace and war (A. L. Sakketty, trans.). Moscow: Ladomyr. (Original work published 1625). [In Russian].
Casanova, J. (2017). On the other side of secularization: the religious and secular dynamics of our global era. (O. Panich, trans.). Kyiv: Dukh i litera. [In Ukrainian].
Markvard O. (2003). The era of alienation to the world. Domestic notes, (6). http://strana-oz.ru/2003/6/epoha-chuzhdosti-miru [In Russian].
Habermas J. (2011). Postmetaphysical thinking (V. Kuplyn, trans.) Kyiv: Dukh i litera. (Original work published 1988). [In Ukrainian].
Habermas J. (2006). Pre-political foundations of a democratic state of law? (V. Vytkovskyi, trans). Dialectics of secularization. About reason and religion. Moscow: Bybleisko-Bohoslovskyi Instytut Sv. Apostola Andreia, 112. [In Russian].
Habermas J. (2008). "Post-secular" society - what is it? Part 1. (M. Kronauer, trans.). Russian philosophical newspaper, 4 (18), 1-2. [In Russian].
Habermas J. (2011) Between naturalism and religion. (B. Skuratov, trans.). Moscow: Ves Myr. [In Russian].
Jerv'e-Lezhe D. (2015) In Search of Certainty: Paradoxes of Religiousness in Developed Modern Societies. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, (1), 254–268. [In Russian].
Adams, N. (2006). Habermas and Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gauchet, M. (1998). La religion dans la démocratie. Parcours de la laïcité. Paris: Gallimard.
Habermas, J. (1992). Transcendence from within, Transcendence in this World. Modernity, and Public Theology. New York: Crossroad.
Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God and Modernity (ed. E. Mendieta). L.: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2010). An Awareness of What is Missing. Faith and Reason in a Post-secular Age. Cambridge: Polity, 15-23.
Taylor, Ch. (1998). Modes of Secularism. Bhargava R. (ed.). Secularism and Its Critics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (2014). What Does Secularism mean. Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Terner B. (2012). Religion in a post-secular society. State, religion, Church, (2), 21-51. [In Russian].
The Ministry of Education and Science is always open to dialogue with the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations, - Serhiy Shkarlet. (2021). https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/mon-zavzhdi-vidkrite-do-dialogu-z-vseukrayinskoyu-radoyu-cerkov-i-religijnih-organizacij-sergij-shkarlet [In Ukrainian].
Vattimo, G. (1991). The End of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Filosofiya osvity. Philosophy of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.