Presocratics and Other Living Beings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2020-26-1-12Keywords:
Pre-Socratics, kinship, humans, non-human living beings, protection, welfareAbstract
Advocates of the questioning of the dominant anthropocentric perspective of the world have been increasingly strongly presenting (bio)ethical demands for a new solution of the relationship between humans and other beings, saying that adherence to the Western philosophical and theological traditions has caused the current environmental, and not just environmental, crisis. The attempts are being made to establish a new relationship by relativizing the differences between man and the non-human living beings, often by attributing specifically human traits and categories, such as dignity, moral status and rights to non-human living beings. The author explores antecedents of the standpoints that deviate from the mainstream Western philosophy, in terms of non-anthropocentric extension of ethics, and finds them in the fragments of first physicists, which emphasize kinship of all varieties of life. Pythagoras, Empedocles, Anaxagoras and Democritus, in this context, considered certain animals and plants as sacred, i.e. they believed that they are, in a sense, responsible for what they do and that they apart from being able to be driven by a natural desire, being able to breathe, feel, be sad and happy, also have a soul, power of discernment, awareness, the ability to think, understanding and mind. Finally, the author believes that solutions or mitigation of the mentioned crisis are not in the simple Aesopeian levelling of animals and plants "upwards", but in an adequate paideutic approach which in humans will develop an inherent (bio)ethical model of accepting non-human living beings as creatures who deserve moral and decent treatment and respect.
References
Aramini, M. (2009). Uvod u bioetiku. Zagreb: Kršćanska sadašnjost.
Aristotel. (2006). Fizika. Beograd: PAIDEIA.
Aristotle. (1991). Metaphysics. (W. D. Ross, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aristotel. (1987). Nagovor na filozofiju. In O duši . Nagovor na filozofiju. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Aristotel. (2012). O disanju. In O duši. Parva naturalia. Beograd: PAIDEIA.
Aristotel. (2012). O opažanju i opažajnom. In O duši. Parva naturalia. Beograd: PAIDEIA.
Aristotel. (2009). O postajanju i propadanju. In O nebu. O postajanju i propadanju. Beograd: PAIDEIA.
Aristotle. (1991). On Plants. (E. S. Forster, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aristotle. (1991). On the Soul. (J. A. Smith, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle I. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Aristotel. (1988). Politika. Zagreb: Liber.
Aristotel. (1989). Retorika. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Aristotel. (2008). Topika. Sofistička opovrgavanja. Beograd: PAIDEIA.
Bentham, J. (1780/2017). An Introduction to the The Principles of Morals and Legislation. URL: http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/bentham1780.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2020.
Библија, Свето писмо Старог завјета, „Прва књига Мојсијева”. (2007). Београд: Св. арх. Син. Срп. прав. црк.
Callicott, J. B. and Frodeman, R. (Eds.). (2009). Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
Chamovitz, D. (2017). (first published 2012). What a Plant Knows, A Field Guide to the Senses. Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Cherniss, H. (1964). Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. New York: OCTAGON BOOKS INC.
Cifrić, I. (2007). Bioetička ekumena. Zagreb: PERGAMENA.
Čović, A. (2009). Biotička zajednica kao temelj odgovornosti za ne-ljudska živa bića. In A. Čović, N. Gosić and L. Tomašević (Eds.). Od nove medicinska etike do integrativne bioetike (pp. 33-46). Zagreb: PERGAMENA / Hrvatsko bioetičko društvo.
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1985-1987). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker I-III. Zürich: Weidmann.
Dombrowski, D. A. (1984). The Philosophy of Vegetarianism. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Dunayer, J. Specizam. (2009). Zagreb. Čakovec: Inst. za etn. i folk. Zagreb, D. D. Čakovec.
Eterović, I. (2017). Kant i bioetika. Zagreb: PERGAMENA, Cent. za int. bioet. Fil. fak. Sveuč. u Zagrebu.
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. (1986). URL: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/123.htm. Accessed 25 February 2020.
Frey, R. G. (2005). Animals and Their Medical Use. In A. I. Cohen and C. H. Wellman (Eds.). Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 91-103.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartman, N. (1973). Novi putevi ontologije. Beograd: BIGZ.
Herodot. (2009). Istorija. Beograd: Dereta.
Homer. (1985). Ilijada. Novi Sad: I.r.o. Mat. srp.
Homer. (2002). Odiseja. Beograd: Zav. za udžb. i nast. sred.
Huffman, C. A. (1999). The Pythagorean tradition. In A. A. Long (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-87.
Jaeger, W. (1967). The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jahr, F. (2012). Reviewing the ethical relations of humans towards animals and plants. In A. Muzur and H.-M. Sass (Eds.). Fritz Jahr and the Foundations of Global Bioethics. The Future of Integrative Bioethics. Berlin – Münster – Wien – Zürich – London: Lit Verlag. Pp. 1-4.
Jamblih. (2012). Pitagorin život. Beograd: DERETA.
Jamieson, D. (2008). Ethics and Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jonas, H. (1990). Princip odgovornosti. Sarajevo: V. Masleša.
Jurić, H. (2010). Etika odgovornosti Hansa Jonasa. Zagreb: PERGAMENA.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2016). Anaksimenov i Diogenov animatizam. Filozofska istraživanja, 141, 36, 1: 75-88. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=244763. Accessed 29 February 2020.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2018). Bioethics and Hereditary Genetic Modifications. Conatus - Journal of Philosophy 3, 1: 31-44. URL: https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt.gr/index.php/Conatus/article/view/18452. Accessed 26 March 2020.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2015b). Dike i dikaiosyne. Скопје: Магнаскен.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2017). Pitagorejska palingenesia. Eidos, I, 1: 97-108. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=595524. Accessed 29 February 2020.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2014). Presokratsko razmatranje φρόνησις-a i αἴσθησις-a. Filozofska istraživanja, 135, 34, 3: 394-396. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=205101. Accessed 29 February 2020.
Kaluđerović, Ž. (2015a). Talesov vitalizam. Filozofska istraživanja, 139, 35, 3: 471-482. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=234180. Accessed 26 February 2020.
Калуђеровић, Ж. and Миљевић, А. (2019). Стагиранин, Ерешанин и не-људска жива бића. ARHE, XVI, 31: 105-131. URL: http://arhe.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/arhe. Accessed 29 February 2020.
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (A. W. Wood, Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Laertije, D. (1973). Životi i mišljenja istaknutih filozofa. Beograd: BIGZ.
Meyer-Abich, K. M. (1997). Praktische Naturphilosophie. München: C. H. Beck.
Meyer-Abich, K. M. (1984). Wege zum Frieden mit der Natur. München und Wien: Hanser.
Platon. (1955). Fedar. In Ijon. Gozba. Fedar. Beograd: Kultura.
Platon. (1981). Timaj. Beograd: „Mladostˮ.
Porphyry. On Abstinence from Animal Food (Trans. T. Taylor). URL: https://books.google.rs/books?id=pu5hAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=porphyry+on+abstinence+from+animal+food+pdf&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjWkejdnr_TAhVBtxoKHTY1BxIQ6AEIJjAB#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed 27 February 2020.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2019). From Dawn till Dusk. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
Regan, T. (1982). All That Dwell Therein. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Regan, T. (2004). The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rinčić, I. (2011). Europska bioetika: ideje i institucije. Zagreb: PERGAMENA.
Singer, P. (1998). Oslobođenje životinja. Zagreb: Ibis grafika.
Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (2001). Writings on an Ethical Life. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Steiner, G. (2005). Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Zagorac, I. (2018). Bioetički senzibilitet. Zagreb: PERGAMENA, Znan. cent. izvr. za int. Bioetiku.
Закон о добробити животиња Републике Србије (Law on Animal Welfare of the Republic of Serbia). URL: http://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_dobrobiti_zivotinja.html. Accessed 25 February 2020.
Žirar, R. (1990). Nasilje i sveto. Novi Sad: Knjiž. zajed. Novog Sada.
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 408
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
