Disability as a Catalyst for Giftedness: Exploring Crossmodal Plasticity and a Teleological Framework for Understanding Exceptional Cognitive Abilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-1-15Keywords:
inclusive understanding of human potential, cognitive abilities, disability, giftedness, crossmodal plasticity, compensatory mechanism, teleological framework, environmental factorsAbstract
This paper challenges the traditional dichotomy between disability and giftedness by exploring the potential for sensory loss to act as a catalyst for exceptional abilities in other domains. Drawing on the concept of crossmodal plasticity – the brain’s remarkable ability to reorganize and compensate for sensory deprivation – the paper argues that individuals who experience sensory loss, particularly at an early age, may develop heightened abilities in their remaining senses, surpassing typical levels of functioning. This argument stems from the understanding that when one sensory pathway is compromised, the brain reallocates neural resources to strengthen other sensory modalities. This compensatory mechanism, often observed in individuals with blindness or deafness, can lead to enhanced perceptual abilities in areas such as auditory processing, tactile sensitivity, or spatial navigation. The paper proposes a teleological framework for understanding giftedness in this context, suggesting that exceptional abilities arising from sensory loss serve a compensatory function, enabling individuals to navigate the world effectively despite their impairments. This perspective challenges the notion of giftedness as solely an innate trait, highlighting the significant role of environmental factors and neural adaptation in shaping human potential. By presenting evidence from existing research on crossmodal plasticity and anecdotal examples of individuals with sensory impairments who have developed extraordinary abilities, the paper encourages a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of human potential. Ultimately, the paper calls for further research to fully explore the implications of crossmodal plasticity for understanding the complex relationship between disability and giftedness, advocating for a strengths-based approach that recognizes and nurtures the unique talents of all individuals, regardless of perceived limitations.
References
Armstrong, T. (2016). 6 Reasons for Including Special Needs Kids in the Classroom. https://www.institute4learning.com/2016/10/16/6-reasons-for-fully-including-children-with-special-needs-in-regular-classrooms/
Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Whiteman, C. (2010). Cognitive and Psychosocial Characteristics of Gifted Students With Written Language Disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355974
Atmaca, F., & Baloğlu, M. (2022). The two sides of cognitive masking: A three-level bayesian meta-analysis on twice-exceptionality. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(4), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862221110875
Auer, E. T. Jr., Bernstein, L. E., Sungkarat, W., Singh, M. (2007). Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults. Neuroreport, 18(7), 645-8. https://doi. org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280d943b9
Bonsteel, S. (2012). APA PsycNET. The Charleston Advisor, 14(1), 16–19. https://doi. org/10.5260/chara.14.1.16
Carroll, La Shun L. (2023). Argument from time as a framework and cross modality as an evolutionary failsafe for gifts and disabilities. Psychosomatic Medicine Research, 5(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.53388/PSMR2023020
Chamberlin, S. A., Buchanan, M., & Vercimak, D. (2007). Serving Twice-Exceptional Preschoolers: Blending Gifted Education and Early Childhood Special Education Practices in Assessment and Program Planning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(3), 372-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320703000305
Collignon, O., Dormal, G., Albouy, G., Vandewalle, G., Voss, P., Phillips, C., & Leporé, F. (2013). Impact of blindness onset on the functional organization and the connectivity of the occipital cortex. Brain, 136(9), 2769-2783. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt176
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray
DeGrazia, D. (2015). A Reply to Critics of Creation Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(5), 423-424. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102531
DePauw, K. P. (2000). Social-Cultural Context of Disability: Implications for Scientific Inquiry and Professional Preparation. Quest, 52(4), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.108 0/00336297.2000.10491723
Dickinson, M., Farley, C., Full, R. J., Koehl, R., & Kram, R. & Lehman, S. (2007). How Animals Move: An Integrative View. Science, 288(5463), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.288.5463.100
Dresp-Langley, B. (2022). Information And Control: Insights from within the brain. The Seventeenth International Multi Conference on Computing in Global Information Technology, ICCGI 2022. May 22-26 2022 ,Venice, Italy. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arxiv.2206.04400
Ellis-Schwabe, M., & Conroy, D. (1983). A Discussion of the Creative Abilities of Learning Disabled, Gifted, and Learning Disabled/Gifted Children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 6(3), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328300600307
Foley Nicpon, M., Allmon, A., Sieck, B., & Stinson, R. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going? Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575
Frasnelli, J., Collignon, O., Voss, P., & Lepore, F. (2011). Crossmodal plasticity in sensory loss. Progress in Brain Research, 191, 233-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444- 53752-2.00002-3
Frenzel H, Bohlender J, Pinsker K, Wohlleben B, Tank J, Lechner SG, et al. (2012) A Genetic Basis for Mechanosensory Traits in Humans. PLoS Biology, 10(5): e1001318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001318
Gittleman, J. L. (2025). Phylogeny. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/ science/phylogeny
Gómez-León, M. I. (2020). Psychobiological bases of creativity in gifted children. Psiquiatría Biológica, 27(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psiq.2020.01.004
Goto, T., Nishida, K. & Nakaya, K., (1999). Internal morphology and function of paired fins in the epaulette shark, Hemiscyllium ocellatum. Ichthyological Research, 46(3), 281- 287. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678514
Henderson, L., & Jarvis, J. (2016). The Gifted Dimension of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: Implications for Professional Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 60-83. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.4.
Hua, O., Shore, B. M., & Makarova, E. V. (2014). Inquiry-based instruction within a community of practice for gifted-ADHD college students. Gifted Education International, 3(1), 74- 86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412447709
Kärcher, S. M., Fenzlaff, S., Hartmann, D., Nagel, S. K., & König, P. (2012). Sensory augmentation for the blind. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 37. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00037
Kilian, J., Neugebauer, A., Scherffig, L., & Wahl, S. (2022). The Unfolding Space Glove: A Wearable Spatio-Visual to Haptic Sensory Substitution Device for Blind People. Sensors, 22(5), 1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051859
Kontakou, A., Dimitriou, G., Panagouli, E., Thomaidis, L., Psaltopoulou, T., Sergentanis, T. N., & Tsitsika, A. (2022). Giftedness and neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 43(7), e483–e497. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001103
Kral, A., & Sharma, A. (2023). Crossmodal plasticity in hearing loss. Trends in Neurosciences, 46(5), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2023.02.004
Lane, S., & Schaaf, R. (2010). Examining the neuroscience evidence for sensory-driven neuroplasticity: implications for sensory-based occupational therapy for children and adolescents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 375-390. https://doi. org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09069
Lee, C., & Ritchotte, J. A. (2017). Seeing and Supporting Twice-Exceptional Learners. The Educational Forum, 82(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1379580
Levy-Tzedek, S., Riemer, D., & Amedi, A. (2014). Color improves “visual” acuity via sound. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00358
Maddocks, D. L. S. (2018). The Identification of Students Who Are Gifted and Have a Learning Disability: A Comparison of Different Diagnostic Criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752096
Mather, N., & Schneider, D. (2023). The Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia. Journal of Intelligence, 11(5), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11050079
Markham, J. A., Greenough, W. T. (2004). Experience-driven brain plasticity: beyond the synapse. Neuron Glia Biology, 1(4), 351-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1740925x05000219
Mateos-Aparicio, P., & Rodríguez-Moreno, A. (2019). The Impact of Studying Brain Plasticity. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 13, 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00066
Mattioni, S., Rezk, M., Battal, C., Vadlamudi, J., & Collignon, O. (2022). Impact of blindness onset on the representation of sound categories in occipital and temporal cortices. eLife, 11, e79370. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.79370
Noel, K., & Edmunds, A. (2006). Constructing a synthetic-analytic framework for precocious writing. Roeper Review, 29(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02783190709554396
Oxford English Dictionary. (2025). Compensate. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/ compensate_v?tl=true
Ortiz-Terán, L., Alonso, T., Perez, D., Aragón, J., Diez, I., Pascual-Leone, A., & Sepulcre, J. (2016). Brain plasticity in blind subjects centralizes beyond the modal cortices. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 10, 3389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00061
Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. M. (2014). An Operational Definition of Twice- Exceptional Learners: Implications and Applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
Reynolds, T. E. (2012). Theology and Disability: Changing the Conversation. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health, 16(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228967.2012.645612
Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2015). A Model of Twice-Exceptionality: Explaining and Defining the Apparent Paradoxical Combination of Disability and Giftedness in Childhood. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 318-340. https://doi.org/1 0.1177/0162353215592499
Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2020). Personalised learning: disability and gifted learners. In D. Pendergast & K. Main (Eds). Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117797-21
Ronksley-Pavia, M., Grootenboer, P., & Pendergast, D. (2018). Privileging the voices of twice- exceptional children: an exploration of lived experiences and stigma narratives. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 4-34. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0162353218816384
Rothschild, B. M., & Woods, R. J. (2012). Epidemiology and Biomechanics of Osteoarthritis. In Rothschild, B. M. (ed.). Principles of Osteoarthritis – Its Definition, Character, Derivation and Modality-Related Recognition (pp. 3-24). InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/28463
Sàenz, M., Lewis, L., Huth, A., Fine, I., & Koch, C. (2008). Visual motion area MT+/V5 responds to auditory motion in human sight-recovery subjects. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(20), 5141- 5148. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0803-08.2008
Sela, I. (2014). Visual and auditory synchronization deficits among dyslexic readers as compared to non-impaired readers: Across-correlation algorithm analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00364
Sharma, A., & Kyong, J. (2020). Exploring the Neurodynamic Signals of the Deafened Brain: Factors Influencing Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 13, 211-212. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00500
Sorgini, F., Caliò, R., Carrozza, M. C., & Oddo, C. (2018). Haptic-assistive technologies for audition and vision sensory disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(4), 394-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1385100
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1529100611418056
Szymanski, E., & Corn, A. (1989). Enabling gifted individuals with disabilities: A challenge torehabilitation counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 20(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1891/0047-2220.20.1.8
Tanguay, A. R., Stiles, N. R. B., Ganguly, I., & Shimojo, S. (2020). Mapping Audio-Visual Crossmodal Interactions in the Visually Impaired. Journal of Vision, 20(11), 1768. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.11.1768
Townend, G. and Brown, R. (2016). Exploring a sociocultural approach to understanding academic self-concept in twice-exceptional students. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.006
van Viersen, S., Kroesbergen, E., Slot, E., & Bree, E. (2016). High reading skills mask dyslexia in gifted children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538517
Vocabulary. (2025). Ontogenesis. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/ontogenesis
Voss, P., Thomas, M. E., Cisneros-Franco, J. M., & Villers-Sidani, E. (2017). Dynamic Brains and the Changing Rules of Neuroplasticity: Implications for Learning and Recovery. Frontiers in Psychology, 08, 1657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01657
Wai, J., & Lovett, B. J. (2021). Improving Gifted Talent Development Can Help Solve Multiple Consequential Real-World Problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020031
Yu, L., Rowland, B. A., & Stein, B. E. (2010). Initiating the development of multisensory integration by manipulating sensory experience. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(14), 4904-4913. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5575-09.2010
Downloads
-
PDF
Downloads: 42
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
