Human in the Shadow of Algorithm in thе Context of Philosophy of Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-5

Keywords:

philosophy, philosophy of education, human being, algorithm, artificial intelligence, , teacher (mentor)-student, information, knowledge, wisdom

Abstract

Relevance. The article examines the influence of artificial intelligence on contemporary education and the role of the human being within conditions of algorithm-driven learning. The purpose of the article is to clarify the concep­tual balance between technology and humanity, between algorithm and thinking. Methods. It analyzes the philosophical foundations of autonomous thinking, the ethical challenges, and the risks of losing critical capacities in the process of inter­acting with technology. The study substantiates the need to combine human men­torship with technological tools in order to preserve the humanistic dimension of education, where artificial intelligence is regarded as a means of expanding human capabilities. Novelty. It emphasizes the boundaries between technological efficiency and the autonomy of human thought, as well as the ethical principles guiding AI integration into the educational process. The concept of the “human in the shadow of the algorithm” is conceptualized within the framework of the phi­losophy of education. Education is presented not merely as a space for knowledge transmission, but as a domain for cultivating critical, moral, and creative thinking that resists the risks of algorithmization. The article analyzes classical and con­temporary approaches to the philosophy of education–from Socrates and Imman­uel Kant to Jürgen Habermas and Martha Nussbaum–and reveals the dangers of algorithmic learning, which may diminish autonomy and critical reflection. Real case studies demonstrate how algorithms can reproduce social inequality, discrimination, or distort pedagogical assessment. At the same time, it is shown that, with ethical application, AI can serve as a catalyst for a new quality of education grounded in dialogue, empathy, and cooperation. Conclusion. Education must remain a space for human thought, where technology serves the human being rather than the reverse. AI should be an opportunity, not a threatan instrument that supports the teacher but does not displace their role as mentor. The future of education in the age of AI lies in the responsible integration of technology that preserves freedom of mind, ethical awareness, and the creative nature of the hu­man being.

Author Biographies

Olga Melnychuk, National University “Odesa Law Academy” (Ukraine)

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Philosophy and the Department of General Theory of Law and State

Kateryna Smaznova, National University “Odesa Law Academy” (Ukraine)

Master’s student of the educational program “Philosophy of Media Practices”

References

Allen, G. (2016). Hierarchy of knowledge – from data to wisdom. International Journal of Current Research in Multidisciplinary, (2), 1–23.

Andrushchenko, V. (ed.). (2021). Philosophy of Education (2nd ed.). Kyiv: National Peda-gogical Dragomanov University. [in Ukrainian].

Dewey, J. (2003). Democracy and Education (M. Oliynyk, I. Bosak, G. Pekhnyk, trans.; I. Farion, ed.). Lviv: Litopys. [in Ukrainian].

Editorial. (2024). AI in schools: Dutch study warns algorithms may discriminate against students. NL Times. https://nltimes.nl/2024/05/13/ai-schools-dutch-study-warns-algorithms-may-discriminate-students.

Gluchman, V. (2018). Nussbaum’s philosophy of education as the foundation for human de-velopment. Human Affairs, 28, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0026

Kruhlui, D. (2020). The use of DIKW methodology for educational proposals in implementing innovative learning. [in Ukrainian]. Science and Education, (4), 48–53. https://doi.org/ 10.24195/2414-4665-2020-4-6.

Kuklin, O., Ivanova, I., & Borovyk, T. (2024). Modelling the integration of artificial intelli¬gence into the educational environment. [in Ukrainian]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 103, 207–232. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v103i5.5735.

Lozovyi, V., & Sidak, L. (2006). Self-development of personality in philosophical reflection and social practice. Kharkiv: Pravo. [in Ukrainian].

Mühlhoff, R., & Henningsen, M. (2025). Chatbots im Schulunterricht: Wir testen das Fobizz-Tool zur automatischen Bewertung von Hausaufgaben. Cornell University. https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06651

Plato. (1999). Dialogues (Y. Kobiv et al., trans.). Kyiv: Osnovy. [in Ukrainian].

Titeradzh, N., & Malchevska, O. (2025). I asked ChatGPT for help – and it told me how to kill myself. [in Ukrainian]. BBC News Ukrainian. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/ articles/cp3xl5y43dvo

Vysotska, O. (2024). Virtue as an important factor in the formation of human identity: Conceptual transformations. [in Ukrainian]. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Bulletin. Philosophy, Philosophy of Law, Political Science, Sociology Series, 4(63), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.63.315202.

Wu, D. (2025). AI safety tool sparks student backlash after flagging art as porn, delet¬ing emails. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/ 2025/09/24/students-lawsuit-ai-tool-gaggle/.

Downloads

Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Melnychuk, O., & Smaznova, K. (2026). Human in the Shadow of Algorithm in thе Context of Philosophy of Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence . Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 31(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-5

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.