Restructuring of Values in the Age of Global Civilizational Transformation

Authors

  • Yaroslav Lyubiviy H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv-city, Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-7323

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-7

Keywords:

values, evaluation, strategy development, artificial intelligence, military-political confrontation, democracy, consolidation

Abstract

Relevance. The modern global military-political confrontation between democracy and totalitarianism is taking place in conditions of epochal civilizational transformation and restructuring of the basic strategic values of man and society. In modern everyday life, the importance of values is growing, as a person constantly appeals to them in his own actions, just as in previous times he appealed to God. The purpose of the article is to clarify the main characteristics of values in a modern globalized society and the way they influence its development. Methods. In this study, values are interpreted as a practical generalization of a set of assessments of life situations in which it is necessary to make one or another choice, and are perceived as normative guidelines, which raises the question of the ontological nature of values. Novelty. Basic values are produced spontaneously or consciously in the process of activity as appropriate strategies, similar to how artificial intelligence produces strategies based on a database and information coming from outside. Values motivate a person to action and have a programming influence on interpersonal relationships and the structure of society. Conclusion. In the process of epochal civilizational transformation, the values of human and societal survival come to the fore and the problem of actualizing existing and inventing new development resources necessary for this is becoming more acute. Philosophy, generalizing the historical and philosophical experience of its development, becomes a metaphilosophy, which, in contact with other spheres of activity, contributes to the understanding and formulation of new values produced by the social system in changed historical circumstances. A democratic society in the face of changing world order and threats to the ecological and military-political order must overcome the habit of consumer experimentation and consolidate based on a new value strategy.

Author Biography

Yaroslav Lyubiviy, H. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv-city, Ukraine)

Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor, Leading Researcher

References

Chang Y.-T. A (2021). Davidsonian Theory of Evaluative Judgment. In: C. M. Yang and R. H. Myers (Eds.) Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value. (Pp. 55-75). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7230-2_4

Corkum, P. (2024). Philosophy’s past: Cognitive values and the history of philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenology Research, 108, 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/ phpr.12990

Dawkins R. (2017). The Selfish Gene (Y. Lebedenko, Trans.). Kharkiv, KSD. [in Ukrainian].

Engel, P. (2021). Davidson on Emotions and Values. In S. C.-M. Yang, & R. H. Myers (Eds.) Donald Davidson on Action, Mind and Value (Pp. 77-92). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-15-7230-2_5

Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment. Minds and Machines, 30, 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2

Harari Y. N. (2021). Sapiens. A Brief History of Humankind (O. Demyanchuk, trans.). Kyiv: Fors Ukraina. [in Ukrainian].

Kissinger H. A., Schmidt E., Huttenlocher D. (2024). The Age of AI: And Our Human Future. [in Ukrainian]. In LLC “Monolit Bizz” (Compl.). Artificial Intelligence and Neural Networks. 112 books in one that will help you bring innovation to life (pp. 61–80). Kharkiv, Monolit.

Lupisella, M. (2020). Cosmological Theories of Value. Science, Philosophy, and Meaning in Cosmic Evolution. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25339-4

Lyubiviy Y. V. Synergistic and virtualistic models of post-nonclassical rationality. In: V. Liakh (Ed.). Philosophical discourses of rationality (pp. 320-404). Kyiv: G. S. Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].

Riedener, S. (2021). Uncertain Values. An Axiomatic Approach to Axiological Uncertainty (W. Hinsch, & T. Schmidt, Eds.). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/9783110736199

Sommer, A. U. (2024). Values. Why We Need Them Although They Don’t Exist (P. Richards, Trans.). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42159-4

Tegmark, M. (2019). Life 3.0. Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. (Z. Korablina, Trans.). Kyiv, Nash Format. [in Uktainian].

Taylor, Ch. (2013). A Secular Age. First book. (O. Panych, Trans.). Kyiv. DUKH I LITERA. [in Uktainian].

Taylor, Ch. (2018). A Secular Age. Second book (O. Panych, Trans.). Kyiv. DUKH I LITERA. [in Uktainian].

Vydra, A. (2023). The value of philosophy: A Canguilhemian perspective. Metaphilosophy. 54, 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12645

Downloads

Abstract views: 0

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Lyubiviy, Y. (2026). Restructuring of Values in the Age of Global Civilizational Transformation. Filosofiya Osvity. Philosophy of Education, 31(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2025-31-2-7

Issue

Section

Articles

Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.